2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The certainty of evidence of these findings ranged from low to high. Previous meta-analyses of existing RCTs on this topic suggested the favorable long-term outcomes associated with CABG in terms of repeat revascularization, 15,25 target vessel revascularization 26 and nonprocedural MI, 15,27 and the increased associated risk for early stroke (30-day and 1-year) 26 and periprocedural MI. 15 A recently published meta-analysis had results consistent with the present study in regard to mortality, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, whereas results on MI differed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The certainty of evidence of these findings ranged from low to high. Previous meta-analyses of existing RCTs on this topic suggested the favorable long-term outcomes associated with CABG in terms of repeat revascularization, 15,25 target vessel revascularization 26 and nonprocedural MI, 15,27 and the increased associated risk for early stroke (30-day and 1-year) 26 and periprocedural MI. 15 A recently published meta-analysis had results consistent with the present study in regard to mortality, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, whereas results on MI differed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%