2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Core Biopsy for Renal Masses: Indications, Accuracy and Results

Abstract: Percutaneous renal tumor biopsies are safe, cost-effective and often conclusive for an acute histological diagnosis. This procedure could be decisive for choosing the optimal treatment, particularly to avoid nephrectomy for benign lesions. Biopsies should not be considered a routine procedure but they could be indicated when there is a lack of radiological evidence in elective patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported accuracy of percutaneous biopsy of renal cortical tumors ranges from 70% to 90% (16)(17)(18)(19)(20), and recent advances in imaging and image-guided intervention, as well as cytologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular techniques, might further expand the role of percutaneous biopsy in the diagnosis of renal cortical tumors (20). However, widespread use of biopsy of renal cortical tumors has been controversial in the urology community owing to factors such as (a) the invasiveness and the potential complications of biopsy, (b) the possibility of sampling errors and the dependence on R enal cortical tumors represent a complex family of neoplasms with unique histopathologic features, cytogenetic defects, and variable clinical behaviors, ranging from the benign oncocytoma to indolent variants of papillary and chromophobe carcinomas to the more aggressive conventional clear cell The first postcontrast sequence was acquired 5 seconds after peak arterial enhancement, followed by 70 seconds after contrast material administration and 3-4 minutes after contrast material administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported accuracy of percutaneous biopsy of renal cortical tumors ranges from 70% to 90% (16)(17)(18)(19)(20), and recent advances in imaging and image-guided intervention, as well as cytologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular techniques, might further expand the role of percutaneous biopsy in the diagnosis of renal cortical tumors (20). However, widespread use of biopsy of renal cortical tumors has been controversial in the urology community owing to factors such as (a) the invasiveness and the potential complications of biopsy, (b) the possibility of sampling errors and the dependence on R enal cortical tumors represent a complex family of neoplasms with unique histopathologic features, cytogenetic defects, and variable clinical behaviors, ranging from the benign oncocytoma to indolent variants of papillary and chromophobe carcinomas to the more aggressive conventional clear cell The first postcontrast sequence was acquired 5 seconds after peak arterial enhancement, followed by 70 seconds after contrast material administration and 3-4 minutes after contrast material administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although few cases have been reported in the literature, 5,12 no cases of seeding have been reported when a coaxial technique is used. 2,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Complication rate of the procedure is low, at around 1%. Bleeding represents the most frequent complication, which usually results in a subcapsular or perinephric haematoma requiring no interventional treatment.…”
Section: Renal Biopsy Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in those studies in which Fuhrman grade was divided in a dichotomous manner -low (I and II) and high (III and IV) grade -the accuracy was significantly higher. 15 …”
Section: Diagnostic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous biopsy can provide a histological diagnosis in selected patients, although inaccurate subtyping rates can occur in up to a quarter of primary tumors and the procedure is not without risk [12]. Therefore, a method to characterize tumors and to predict their biological behavior accurately remains somewhat elusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%