2016
DOI: 10.1179/2045772314y.0000000298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion for patients with a high-riding vertebral artery

Abstract: Our small case series results suggested that percutaneous anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion is a technically minimally invasive, safe, feasible, and useful method to treat patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Posterior surgery is prone to damage of the vertebral artery and nerves [25], resulting in severe consequences such as massive haemorrhage of the vertebral artery, cerebral infarction and hemiplegia caused by vertebral artery embolism, and dyspnoea resulting from central nervous system damage; in severe cases, the life of the patient may be in danger [26,27]. Some cases involve difficulties and risks when using the posterior approach, such as the abnormal development and pathway of the vertebral artery [28][29][30] and congenital or iatrogenic absence of the bony structure of the atlantoaxial vertebra pedicle [31,32], and the atlantoaxial complex can be more safely fused through the anterior approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posterior surgery is prone to damage of the vertebral artery and nerves [25], resulting in severe consequences such as massive haemorrhage of the vertebral artery, cerebral infarction and hemiplegia caused by vertebral artery embolism, and dyspnoea resulting from central nervous system damage; in severe cases, the life of the patient may be in danger [26,27]. Some cases involve difficulties and risks when using the posterior approach, such as the abnormal development and pathway of the vertebral artery [28][29][30] and congenital or iatrogenic absence of the bony structure of the atlantoaxial vertebra pedicle [31,32], and the atlantoaxial complex can be more safely fused through the anterior approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…resulting from central nervous system damage; in severe cases, the life of the patient may be in danger [24,25]. Some cases involve difficulties and risks when using the posterior approach, such as the abnormal development and pathway of the vertebral artery [26][27][28] and congenital or iatrogenic absence of the bony structure of the atlantoaxial vertebra pedicle [29,30], and the atlantoaxial complex can be more safely fused through the anterior approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posterior surgery is prone to damage of the vertebral artery and nerves [23], resulting in severe consequences such as massive haemorrhage of the vertebral artery, cerebral infarction and hemiplegia caused by vertebral artery embolism, and dyspnoea resulting from central nervous system damage; in severe cases, the life of the patient may be in danger [24,25]. Some cases involve difficulties and risks when using the posterior approach, such as the abnormal development and pathway of the vertebral artery [26][27][28] and congenital or iatrogenic absence of the bony structure of the atlantoaxial vertebra pedicle [29,30], and the atlantoaxial complex can be more safely fused through the anterior approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%