2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.accreview.2005.08.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous and Open Renal Revascularizations Have Equivalent Long-Term Functional Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the current study, immediate and long-term post procedure creatinine deterioration and dialysis dependency have been associated with increased mortality. [16][17][18] The presence of MetS did appear to alter the survival after renal intervention.…”
Section: Metsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the current study, immediate and long-term post procedure creatinine deterioration and dialysis dependency have been associated with increased mortality. [16][17][18] The presence of MetS did appear to alter the survival after renal intervention.…”
Section: Metsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Duplex ultrasound criteria to identify renal artery stenosis have been previously described. [16][17][18] In the presence of clinical criteria defined by Rundback et al 19 and a Ն60% stenosis on ultrasound or magnetic resonance angiography or a positive renal scan, angiography was performed. The majority of these interventions were transfemoral, and no distal protection devices were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DUS criteria to identify renal artery stenosis has been previously described. [8][9][10] Angiography was performed in the presence of clinical criteria as defined by Rundback et al 11 and a Ն60% stenosis on DUS or MRA or a positive renal scan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 For each patient, demographics, existing comorbid conditions, and risk factors for atherosclerosis were identified. The normal renal volume was calculated as 2 ϫ body weight (kg) in cm 3 . 8 Failure of preservation was considered to be a persistent 10% decrease in volume in two consecutive scans.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal volume (in cm 3 ) was estimated in all patients as renal length (cm) ϫ renal width (cm) ϫ renal depth (cm) ϫ 0.5. 8 For each patient, demographics, existing comorbid conditions, and risk factors for atherosclerosis were identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%