1978
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(78)90029-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percolation with nearest neighbour interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies [2,3,6,7], the relation between the correlation strength and the percolation threshold was discussed. In our model, if we deem the polymer length as a measure of the correlation strength, we would conclude that the critical occupation probability decreases as the correlation strength goes up.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies [2,3,6,7], the relation between the correlation strength and the percolation threshold was discussed. In our model, if we deem the polymer length as a measure of the correlation strength, we would conclude that the critical occupation probability decreases as the correlation strength goes up.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption simplifies the problem, but is not always satisfied in reality. The introduction of correlations into the percolation problem dates back to the 1970s, when Duckers [2,3] studied site percolation with correlations. These early simulation data seemed to suggest a non-monotonic behavior of the percolation threshold as a function of the correlation strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain a deeper insight, it is fruitful to investigate how the percolation behavior depends on the intercomponent interaction, which affects the correlation of the domain patterns. It is known that the percolation threshold is sensitive to the correlation between elements, i.e., the number of vertices in bond percolation and the intersite interaction in annealed percolation [20,[35][36][37]. The most important report related to us is Ref.…”
Section: E Percolation Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(c) shows the same for the negative (repulsive) correlation ( k v = k h = 0.1). It is evident that strong attractive correlation promotes formation of dense clusters and that the percolation threshold in this case is achieved at a much larger concentration of damaged sites, excluding some low values of k , where p c may be even less than in the case of k v = k h = 1 (Duckers 1978).…”
Section: Percolation Structuresmentioning
confidence: 70%