1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02102431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percolation techniques in disordered spin flip dynamics: Relation to the unique invariant measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the site DP line, the DK PCA displays an inactive-active phase transition at the critical point p * 1 = p * 2 = 0.705 489(4) [16], corresponding to ε * = 0.294 511(4), within the rigorous bounds mentioned before (the numbers between parentheses indicate the uncertainty in the last digit or digits of the data). Curiously, the relationship between Stavskaya's PCA and the DK PCA seems to have gone unnoticed in previous investigations [6][7][8][9][10][11], although a coupling scheme with an "independent oriented percolation" process equivalent with site DP was used in [8]. It is worth mentioning that Stavskaya's model, together with another PCA introduced by the same epoch, Vasil'ev's model [6,17]which corresponds to the p 2 = 0 line in the DK PCA or, equivalently, to a probabilistic version of CA rule 18 in Wolfram's classification scheme [18]-predates the DK PCA and related models by almost two decades, but did not receive much attention, not even when CA and PCA reentered the mainstream scientific agenda in the 1980s.…”
Section: Stavskaya's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the site DP line, the DK PCA displays an inactive-active phase transition at the critical point p * 1 = p * 2 = 0.705 489(4) [16], corresponding to ε * = 0.294 511(4), within the rigorous bounds mentioned before (the numbers between parentheses indicate the uncertainty in the last digit or digits of the data). Curiously, the relationship between Stavskaya's PCA and the DK PCA seems to have gone unnoticed in previous investigations [6][7][8][9][10][11], although a coupling scheme with an "independent oriented percolation" process equivalent with site DP was used in [8]. It is worth mentioning that Stavskaya's model, together with another PCA introduced by the same epoch, Vasil'ev's model [6,17]which corresponds to the p 2 = 0 line in the DK PCA or, equivalently, to a probabilistic version of CA rule 18 in Wolfram's classification scheme [18]-predates the DK PCA and related models by almost two decades, but did not receive much attention, not even when CA and PCA reentered the mainstream scientific agenda in the 1980s.…”
Section: Stavskaya's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while many rigorous results exist for this model [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], it has never received a full numerical treatment to estimate its critical point and critical exponents. In this Brief Report we proceed to such an investigation of Stavskaya's model by Monte Carlo simulations and finite-size scaling techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relaxation for typical realizations of the disorder in a general class of (quenched) random spin systems has been studied by Gielis and Maes (1996). Their result for the biased random voter model reads in our notations as follows (see also Klein 1994).…”
Section: In (215) C Dα Is An Increasing Function Defined On [0 ∞) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A powerful tool in the analysis of these systems is the so-called logarithmic Sobolev inequality. Gielis and Maes (1996) tackle the problem of estimating the asymptotic relaxation in a more general class of random spin systems with quenched disorder. Their method consists of a coupling of the spin system to the contact process and the use of percolation techniques on the graphical representation of the contact process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analyzed case all the interactions have absolute value equal to 1, so we obtain T A 4d 2 . We will not give the proof of this point that can be found in [14] and we concentrate our attention on the proof of the second point.…”
Section: Auto-correlation Time For the Edwards-anderson Spin-glass Momentioning
confidence: 99%