2010
DOI: 10.1167/8.6.1131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual training yields rapid improvements in visually impaired youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Explanations for these interactive effects of speed, eccentricity, and CN on motion perception remain to be discovered. Other recent studies have also found reduced sensitivity to peripheral stimuli in some persons with low vision (Nyquist, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Explanations for these interactive effects of speed, eccentricity, and CN on motion perception remain to be discovered. Other recent studies have also found reduced sensitivity to peripheral stimuli in some persons with low vision (Nyquist, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Perhaps the moving visual fields of these observers are perceptually less coherent than those of typically sighted observers. Perhaps these differences in motion threshold are pertinent to suggestions that children with low vision are often less attentive than typically sighted children to the peripheral visual fields (Nyquist, 2007).…”
Section: Motion Speed Affects Observers With Nystagmusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 Fourteen studies reported a cutoff criterion for visual acuity. 1,11,13,21,27,28,30,35,47,51,54,75,78,89 Slightly more often, studies reported the degree of visual impairment (e.g., severe visual impairment, legal blindness) or fulfillment of certain criteria for low vision (e.g., the criteria for low vision of the WHO or the ICD criteria). 1,6,16,20,39,40,44,50,56,62,69,75,90,93,96,104,110,111,121 In some cases, authors quantified the number of participants with a certain degree of visual impairment, that is, how many participants had visual impairment and how many participants were blind.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6,16,20,39,40,44,50,56,62,69,75,90,93,96,104,110,111,121 In some cases, authors quantified the number of participants with a certain degree of visual impairment, that is, how many participants had visual impairment and how many participants were blind. 32,39,74,85,90,97,108,123 Thirteen studies reported the number of participants that fell into a visual acuity range or reported the visual acuity of each individual participant, 7,8,12,13,15,21,26,27,43,61,78,95,110 whereas 18 studies reported the diagnoses or cause of visual impairment of their participants. 1 studies, participants had visual impairment or blindness caused by various eye conditions.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation