Perceptual training yields rapid improvements in visually impaired youth

Abstract

Visual function demands coordinated responses to information over a wide field of view, involving both central and peripheral vision. Visually impaired individuals often seem to underutilize peripheral vision, even in absence of obvious peripheral deficits. Motivated by perceptual training studies with typically sighted adults, we examined the effectiveness of perceptual training in improving peripheral perception of visually impaired youth. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness of three training regimens: (1) an action video game, (2) a psychophysical task that combined attentional tracking with a spatially and temporally unpredictable motion discrimination task, and (3) a control video game. Training with both the action video game and modified attentional tracking yielded improvements in visual performance. Training effects were generally larger in the far periphery and appear to be stable 12 months after training. These results indicate that peripheral perception might be under-utilized by visually impaired youth and that this underutilization can be improved with only ~8 hours of perceptual training. Moreover, the similarity of improvements following attentional tracking and action video-game training suggest that well-documented effects of action video-game training might be due to the sustained deployment of attention to multiple dynamic targets while concurrently requiring rapid attending and perception of unpredictable events.

Larger Receptive Field Size as a Mechanism Underlying Atypical Motion Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder

“…However, neither observation rules out smaller systematic deviations in central fixation. For our motion task, fixation away from center should actually improve performance for high contrast stimuli (Nyquist, Lappin, Zhang, & Tadin, 2016; Tadin et al, 2003), and because stimulus sizes were intermixed, it would do so across all stimulus sizes, which is inconsistent with our findings. Taken together, we believe that eye movements cannot explain our findings.…”

Boosting Learning Efficacy with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Intact and Brain-Damaged Humans

“…The human brain changes throughout life (Li et al, 2004;Gilbert and Li, 2012). Visual training is a well known tool for inducing such changes, improving sensory performance in healthy adults (Sagi, 2011;Li, 2016;Wang et al, 2016;Dosher and Lu, 2017) and in various clinical populations (Deveau et al, 2013;Melnick et al, 2016;Nyquist et al, 2016), a phenomenon referred to as visual perceptual learning (VPL). The specific role of different cortical visual areas during VPL is still openly debated, with several mechanisms likely contributing to learning.…”

Boosting learning efficacy with non-invasive brain stimulation in intact and brain-damaged humans

“…The human brain changes throughout life (Gilbert & Li, 2012;Liat al., 2004). Visual training is a well-known tool for inducing such changes, improving sensory performance in healthy adults (reviewed inDosher & Lu, 2017;Li, 2016;Sagi, 2011;Wang et al, 2016); and in various clinical populations (Deveau et al, 2013;Melnick et al, 2016;Nyquist et al, 2016), a phenomenon referred to as visual perceptual learning (VPL). The specific role of different visual areas of the brain during VPL is still openly debated, with several mechanisms likely contributing to learning.…”