“…Some of these manipulations involved interrupting speech stimuli with periodic silent intervals, where the listener had to reconstruct the speech stream from the remaining samples (e.g., Chatterjee et al, 2010), and some others involved filling the silent intervals with loud noise bursts, which induced continuity illusion and phonemic restoration, quantified by an increase in intelligibility of interrupted speech (e.g., Benard and Başkent, 2013). Further, to capture cognitive effects fully, such as potential effects of cognitive slowing down due to aging, slow speech rates were also included (Saija et al, 2013). As a result, a number of settings were used to measure top-down restoration, with two interruption rates (1.25, 2.50 Hz) at two speech rates (slow, normal), presented with or without filler noise, producing eight testing conditions.…”