2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0422-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Restoration of Degraded Speech Is Preserved with Advancing Age

Abstract: Cognitive skills, such as processing speed, memory functioning, and the ability to divide attention, are known to diminish with aging. The present study shows that, despite these changes, older adults can successfully compensate for degradations in speech perception. Critically, the older participants of this study were not pre-selected for high performance on cognitive tasks, but only screened for normal hearing. We measured the compensation for speech degradation using phonemic restoration, where intelligibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
77
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
9
77
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A remarkable and numerously replicated finding of mid twentieth-century research was that under some conditions, accurate speech perception is possible even if half of the original speech signal is periodically masked by noise or replaced by silence (Miller and Licklider, 1950;Powers and Speaks, 1973;Huggins, 1975;Powers and Wilcox, 1977;Nelson et al, 2003;Nelson and Jin, 2004;Buss et al, 2009;Jin and Nelson, 2010;Saija et al, 2014). Despite these physical constraints, listeners are able to exploit the inherent perceptual redundancies of naturally produced speech and use the remaining low-level speech cues to obtain high-level linguistic information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A remarkable and numerously replicated finding of mid twentieth-century research was that under some conditions, accurate speech perception is possible even if half of the original speech signal is periodically masked by noise or replaced by silence (Miller and Licklider, 1950;Powers and Speaks, 1973;Huggins, 1975;Powers and Wilcox, 1977;Nelson et al, 2003;Nelson and Jin, 2004;Buss et al, 2009;Jin and Nelson, 2010;Saija et al, 2014). Despite these physical constraints, listeners are able to exploit the inherent perceptual redundancies of naturally produced speech and use the remaining low-level speech cues to obtain high-level linguistic information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these manipulations involved interrupting speech stimuli with periodic silent intervals, where the listener had to reconstruct the speech stream from the remaining samples (e.g., Chatterjee et al, 2010), and some others involved filling the silent intervals with loud noise bursts, which induced continuity illusion and phonemic restoration, quantified by an increase in intelligibility of interrupted speech (e.g., Benard and Başkent, 2013). Further, to capture cognitive effects fully, such as potential effects of cognitive slowing down due to aging, slow speech rates were also included (Saija et al, 2013). As a result, a number of settings were used to measure top-down restoration, with two interruption rates (1.25, 2.50 Hz) at two speech rates (slow, normal), presented with or without filler noise, producing eight testing conditions.…”
Section: Speech Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During signal processing, first the speech rate was changed. For slowing down, sentences were lengthened to twice the original duration, preserving the original pitch using PRAAT software (Saija et al, 2013). The normal and slow-rate sentences were interrupted with the two interruption rates, with a duty cycle of 50%, and with 10-ms cosine-ramping on and off transitions.…”
Section: Speech Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations