2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0387-7604(00)00098-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual-motor, visual and cognitive ability in very low birthweight preschool children without neonatal ultrasound abnormalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The AIMS scores for the comparison group (Xϭ13.6, SDϭ3.5) and the full-term group (Xϭ14.9, SDϭ2.2) were not different from the AIMS scores of the preterm group (Xϭ10.9, SDϭ4.6) (Pϭ. 15 and Pϭ.2, respectively) for the first visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AIMS scores for the comparison group (Xϭ13.6, SDϭ3.5) and the full-term group (Xϭ14.9, SDϭ2.2) were not different from the AIMS scores of the preterm group (Xϭ10.9, SDϭ4.6) (Pϭ. 15 and Pϭ.2, respectively) for the first visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The relationship between learning and sensorimotor abilities, however, is complex. 15,16 For example, children with learning disabilities may or may not also display developmental coordination disorders. 17 Children with autism also display a wide range of intelligence and sensory differences, and deficits in each area are not always equal in severity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effects are expected when premature birth results in major neurological impairment. However, a growing body of evidence reveals that, when other risk factors are controlled, a number of those children who are considered neurologically normal during infancy score significantly lower than their full term (FT) peers on developmental batteries assessing motor, sensory, and cognitive functions (Anderson & Doyle, 2003;Bhutta, Cleves, Casey, Cradock, & Anand, 2002;Hall, McLeod, Counsell, Thomson, & Mutch, 1995;Torrioli et al, 2000;Wolke & Meyer, 1999). Cognitive difficulties as well as clumsiness, visuo-motor, and visuo-spatial problems are often reported (Bracewell & Marlow, 2002;Hall et al, 1995;Herrgard, Luoma, Tuppurainen, Karjalainen, & Martikainen, 1993;Jongmans, Mercuri, de Vries, Dubowitz, & Henderson, 1997;Marlow, Wolke, Bracewell, & Samara, 2005;Wood, Marlow, Costeloe, Gibson, & Wilkinson, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In follow-up, former preterm infants frequently show perceptual, motor, cognitive, and behavioral disabilities, even in the absence of cranial ultrasound abnormalities [2] . Some investigators have suggested that these defi cits refl ect a functional adaptation to infl uences secondary to preterm birth resulting from excessive sensory stimulation in the extrauterine environment [3][4][5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%