2008
DOI: 10.1167/8.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual learning of bisection stimuli under roving: Slow and largely specific

Abstract: In perceptual learning, performance often improves within a short time if only one stimulus variant is presented, such as a line bisection stimulus with one outer-line-distance. However, performance stagnates if two bisection stimuli with two outer-line-distances are presented randomly interleaved. Recently, S. G. Kuai, J. Y. Zhang, S. A. Klein, D. M. Levi, and C. Yu, (2005) proposed that learning under roving conditions is impossible in general. Contrary to this proposition, we show here that perceptual learn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomly mixing easy and difficult stimuli ('roving') in a classification task hampers learning with the 2-component rule, but not with the rate-optimized 1-component rule. A similar phenomenon is observed in perceptual discrimination tasks when bisection stimuli of unequal difficulties are randomly intermixed (Otto et al, 2006;Parkosadze et al, 2008;Clarke et al, 2014). In our model performance degrades because the easy stimuli simultaneously trigger suprathreshold weight changes and suprathreshold voltages that are then prematurely consolidated, even when these changes are not accurate enough to correctly classify the difficult stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Randomly mixing easy and difficult stimuli ('roving') in a classification task hampers learning with the 2-component rule, but not with the rate-optimized 1-component rule. A similar phenomenon is observed in perceptual discrimination tasks when bisection stimuli of unequal difficulties are randomly intermixed (Otto et al, 2006;Parkosadze et al, 2008;Clarke et al, 2014). In our model performance degrades because the easy stimuli simultaneously trigger suprathreshold weight changes and suprathreshold voltages that are then prematurely consolidated, even when these changes are not accurate enough to correctly classify the difficult stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…If the easy and difficult stimuli are presented randomly interleaved, the 2-component rule performs less well, unlike the 1-component rule (Fig. 7D), analogously to human behaviour (Parkosadze et al, 2008;Clarke et al, 2014). The performance decrease with roving (mixing) occurs because weight changes, in response to an easy stimulus, point further away from the optimal weight due to the larger variance of presynaptic rates around the mean for these easy stimuli.…”
Section: Consolidation By Selecting Informative Learning Eventsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that while these handcrafted weights are not robust to change in the spacings of the outer bars, it is possible to learn the network for different spacings using BPTT algorithm (data not shown). Recently Herzog and his colleagues (Parkosadze et al 2008) have demonstrated that it is possible to learn different spacings.…”
Section: Robustness To Variations In Weight Matrix and Number Of Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the alternative model that perceptual learning is based on modifying intrinsic V1 connections [13], it confirms improvements in bisection learning under stimulus roving [12], and a weak learning transfer from a trained to a non-trained stimulus width [11]. It moreover makes several testable predictions both on the behavioral and the neuronal level:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%