2009
DOI: 10.1080/13506280701757577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual learning and acquired face familiarity: Evidence from inversion, use of internal features, and generalization between viewpoints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related question is whether perceptual learning effects may have influenced face processing in general due to repeated exposure with face stimuli. Effects of mere exposure have been demonstrated in several studies for face identity discriminations [38][40]. Heron-Delaney et al [39] showed for example that the development of ‘own-race effect’ (characterized by enhanced identity discrimination of members of one's own race) in Caucasian infants can be eliminated by exposing children to booklets containing a variety of faces of a different race between the age of 6 and 9 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related question is whether perceptual learning effects may have influenced face processing in general due to repeated exposure with face stimuli. Effects of mere exposure have been demonstrated in several studies for face identity discriminations [38][40]. Heron-Delaney et al [39] showed for example that the development of ‘own-race effect’ (characterized by enhanced identity discrimination of members of one's own race) in Caucasian infants can be eliminated by exposing children to booklets containing a variety of faces of a different race between the age of 6 and 9 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Mundy et al . [ 1 ] demonstrates that comparison, during exposure training, does help facilitate discrimination performance when the faces to be discriminated at test were the same as those presented during the exposure phase (see also [ 19 , 25 , 47 , 48 ]). Similar effects have also been demonstrated using identical twins [ 49 ], in which case the enhancement in discrimination transferred to new images of the same twins (see also [ 50 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this cannot be ruled out, it should be remembered that a large number of perceptual learning studies that demonstrate comparison effects through the advantage for intermixed over blocked exposure schedules ( e.g. [ 1 , 19 , 21 , 25 , 48 ]). So the possibility that comparison effects per se are false positives seems unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the internal features of a face (e.g., the eyes, nose, and mouth) have more influence than the external features (e.g., hair or face outline) in the recognition of familiar faces compared with unfamiliar faces (Ellis, Shepherd, & Davies, 1979; Menon, White, & Kemp, 2015; Young, Hay, McWeeny, Flude, & Ellis, 1985; for a detailed review see Osborne & Stevenage, 2008). More recently, experimental work has used a brief period of familiarization to facilitate better recognition accuracy normally associated with familiar face matching, and several studies have reported benefits in performance (Clutterbuck & Johnston, 2005; Dwyer, Mundy, Vladeanu, & Honey, 2009; Mundy, Honey, & Dwyer, 2007). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%