2014
DOI: 10.1177/1362361313519872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual inference and autistic traits

Abstract: Autistic people are better at perceiving details. Major theories explain this in terms of bottom-up sensory mechanisms or in terms of top-down cognitive biases. Recently, it has become possible to link these theories within a common framework. This framework assumes that perception is implicit neural inference, combining sensory evidence with prior perceptual knowledge. Within this framework, perceptual differences may occur because of enhanced precision in how sensory evidence is represented or because sensor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing literature in this area of computational psychiatry that we will briefly summarize. Similar arguments have also been applied in other psychiatric conditions; particularly autism: see (Lawson et al, 2014, Paton et al, 2012, Pellicano and Burr, 2012, Skewes et al, 2014, Van de Cruys et al, 2014). …”
Section: Gain Control and Precision In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There is a growing literature in this area of computational psychiatry that we will briefly summarize. Similar arguments have also been applied in other psychiatric conditions; particularly autism: see (Lawson et al, 2014, Paton et al, 2012, Pellicano and Burr, 2012, Skewes et al, 2014, Van de Cruys et al, 2014). …”
Section: Gain Control and Precision In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In those cases, prior information should also be learned and used inefficiently, as findings by Skewes, Jegindø, and Gebauer (2014) suggest. However, extracting a mean estimate for a single display (e.g., contrast detection, average motion discrimination, or numerosity estimation) should not pose a problem in ASD when the display does not include noise that should be weighted differently than the rest of the input, nor will learning a prior cause difficulties in such conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘High systemizers’ might be able to structure their tapping better than ‘low systemizers’ causing lower variability across all conditions. This effect of personality might be related to altered predictive processing in people high in systemizing4647.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%