Abstract:We present a novel method for image anomaly detection, where algorithms that use samples drawn from some distribution of "normal" data, aim to detect out-of-distribution (abnormal) samples. Our approach includes a combination of encoder and generator for mapping an image distribution to a predefined latent distribution and vice versa. It leverages Generative Adversarial Networks to learn these data distributions and uses perceptual loss for the detection of image abnormality. To accomplish this goal, we introd… Show more
“…The reconstruction error, thus, indicates the abnormalities. The latest methods broadly extend this idea by employing different combinations of autoencoders and adversarial losses of GAN's (OCGAN [16], GANomaly [52], ALOCC [53], DAOL [22] PIAD [18]), variational or robust autoencoders [37], energy-based models (DSEBM [13]), probabilistic interpretation of the latent space [54], [55], bidirectional GANs [56], memory blocks [14], etc. The main difficulties of such approaches are: choosing an effective dissimilarity metric and searching for the right degree of compression (the size of the bottleneck).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our paper, we evaluate and compare the strongest SOTA approaches ( [15], [18], and [19]) on the two aforementioned medical imaging tasks. We find these methods either to struggle detecting such types of abnormalities, or to require a lot of time and resources for training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent related studies [29], [31], [32] showed the effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric between images (the perceptual loss), and as a score of anomaly [18]. Also, the use of the perceptual loss for training autoencoders has been very popular in a variety of tasks [18], [29], [32]- [36] except -inexplicably-in the task of image anomaly detection where it has been somewhat dismissed so far. Trained only on normal data, the autoencoders tend to produce a high reconstruction error between the input and the output when the input is an abnormal sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, we propose a new approach to the basic setup of anomaly detection model. Most approaches [13], [16]- [18], [20] prescribe not to use any anomaly examples during the model setup, dismissing the questions of optimization and of hyperparameter selection for such models. However, in reality, some types of abnormalities to detect are actually known (for example, the most frequent pathologies on the chest X-rays).…”
Anomaly detection is the problem of recognizing abnormal inputs based on the seen examples of normal data. Despite recent advances of deep learning in recognizing image anomalies, these methods still prove incapable of handling complex images, such as those encountered in the medical domain. Barely visible abnormalities in chest X-rays or metastases in lymph nodes on the scans of the pathology slides resemble normal images and are very difficult to detect. To address this problem, we introduce a new powerful method of image anomaly detection. It relies on the classical autoencoder approach with a redesigned training pipeline to handle high-resolution, complex images, and a robust way of computing an image abnormality score. We revisit the very problem statement of fully unsupervised anomaly detection, where no abnormal examples are provided during the model setup. We propose to relax this unrealistic assumption by using a very small number of anomalies of confined variability merely to initiate the search of hyperparameters of the model. We evaluate our solution on two medical datasets containing radiology and digital pathology images, where the state-of-the-art anomaly detection models, originally devised for natural image benchmarks, fail to perform sufficiently well. The proposed approach suggests a new baseline for anomaly detection in medical image analysis tasks a .
“…The reconstruction error, thus, indicates the abnormalities. The latest methods broadly extend this idea by employing different combinations of autoencoders and adversarial losses of GAN's (OCGAN [16], GANomaly [52], ALOCC [53], DAOL [22] PIAD [18]), variational or robust autoencoders [37], energy-based models (DSEBM [13]), probabilistic interpretation of the latent space [54], [55], bidirectional GANs [56], memory blocks [14], etc. The main difficulties of such approaches are: choosing an effective dissimilarity metric and searching for the right degree of compression (the size of the bottleneck).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our paper, we evaluate and compare the strongest SOTA approaches ( [15], [18], and [19]) on the two aforementioned medical imaging tasks. We find these methods either to struggle detecting such types of abnormalities, or to require a lot of time and resources for training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent related studies [29], [31], [32] showed the effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric between images (the perceptual loss), and as a score of anomaly [18]. Also, the use of the perceptual loss for training autoencoders has been very popular in a variety of tasks [18], [29], [32]- [36] except -inexplicably-in the task of image anomaly detection where it has been somewhat dismissed so far. Trained only on normal data, the autoencoders tend to produce a high reconstruction error between the input and the output when the input is an abnormal sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, we propose a new approach to the basic setup of anomaly detection model. Most approaches [13], [16]- [18], [20] prescribe not to use any anomaly examples during the model setup, dismissing the questions of optimization and of hyperparameter selection for such models. However, in reality, some types of abnormalities to detect are actually known (for example, the most frequent pathologies on the chest X-rays).…”
Anomaly detection is the problem of recognizing abnormal inputs based on the seen examples of normal data. Despite recent advances of deep learning in recognizing image anomalies, these methods still prove incapable of handling complex images, such as those encountered in the medical domain. Barely visible abnormalities in chest X-rays or metastases in lymph nodes on the scans of the pathology slides resemble normal images and are very difficult to detect. To address this problem, we introduce a new powerful method of image anomaly detection. It relies on the classical autoencoder approach with a redesigned training pipeline to handle high-resolution, complex images, and a robust way of computing an image abnormality score. We revisit the very problem statement of fully unsupervised anomaly detection, where no abnormal examples are provided during the model setup. We propose to relax this unrealistic assumption by using a very small number of anomalies of confined variability merely to initiate the search of hyperparameters of the model. We evaluate our solution on two medical datasets containing radiology and digital pathology images, where the state-of-the-art anomaly detection models, originally devised for natural image benchmarks, fail to perform sufficiently well. The proposed approach suggests a new baseline for anomaly detection in medical image analysis tasks a .
“…The deep model effectively detected the abnormal events in surveillance video. In [14]- [16] denoising auto-encoders and GANs were used to adversely learn latent representations for one-class novelty detection. A deep convolution neural network while utilizing ImageNet for feature extraction was used with transfer-level learning for an unsupervised anomaly detection in medical images [17].…”
With growing security threats, many online and offine frameworks have been proposed for anomaly detection in video sequences. However, existing online anomaly detection techniques are either computationally very expensive or lack desirable accuracy. This research work proposes a novel particle filtering based framework for online anomaly detection which detects video frames with anomalous activities based upon the posterior probability of activities in a video sequence. The proposed method also detects anomalous regions in anomalous video frames. We propose novel prediction and measurement models to accurately detect anomalous video frames and anomalous regions in video frames. Novel prediction model for particle prediction and likelihood model for assigning weights to these particles are proposed. These models efficiently utilise variable sized cell structure which creates variable sized subregions of scenes in video frames. Furthermore, they efficiently extract and utilise information from the video frame in the form of size, motion and location features. The proposed framework is tested on UCSD and LIVE datasets and compared with the existing state-of-the-art algorithms in the literature. The proposed anomaly detection algorithm outperforms the state-of-the art algorithms in terms of reduced Equal Error Rate (EER) with comparatively lesser processing time. INDEX TERMS Video anomaly detection, online framework, particle filtering, inference mechanism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.