1952
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1952.tb01122.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Homeostasis and Distress Vocalization in Puppies1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that types of vocalisation have been changed across test weeks. In parallel with findings of Fredericson (14), yelping was the predominant stress vocalisation in 8 week old Kangal puppies in OFT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It was observed that types of vocalisation have been changed across test weeks. In parallel with findings of Fredericson (14), yelping was the predominant stress vocalisation in 8 week old Kangal puppies in OFT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The common precipitating factor was separation from the familiar environment; restraint and confinement were factors only in that they prevented puppies from returning to familiar places. Fredericson (1952) observed that the presence of a littermate will reduce the amount of vocalization by 50-90%, depending on whether the puppies are first tested in the single or the paired condition. Elliott and Scott (1961) found that separation from mother and littermates within the home pen evokes distress vocalization at rates approximately half those produced in an unfamiliar pen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some published reports confirm that the presence of another dog dramatically reduces behavioral distress (Fredericson, 1952;Ross et al, 1960;Scott & Marston, 1950). On the other hand, the presence of a companion does not markedly affect the degree of response to a fear-provoking sound (Davis et al, 1977), and animals tested in pairs were slower to approach an unfamiliar object than were animals tested singly (Davis et al, 1977).…”
Section: Secure Base Effects In Dogsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There has also been some investigation of ways of alleviating distress reactions; some of these were discussed in the secure base section. At this point we will only note that familiar housing conditions, the presence of familiar objects or individuals (Elliott & Scott, 1961), or confinement to a sound-proofroom (Scott & DeGhett, 1972) reduce the distress response, whereas physical restraint increases the degree of distress evinced (Fredericson, 1952;Ross et al, 1960). Elliot and Scott (1961) showed that with age controlled, the greater the pup's experience with separation, the less distress it displayed.…”
Section: Separation Effects In Dogsmentioning
confidence: 99%