1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00144117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual grouping for generic recognition

Abstract: We address the problem of recognition of generic objects from a single intensity image. This precludes the use of purely geometric methods which assume that models are geometrically and precisely designed. Instead, we propose to use descriptions in terms of features and their qualitative geometric relationships. To succeed, it is clear that these features need to be high level, rather than points or lines. We propose to detect groups using perceptual organization criteria such as proximity, symmetry, paralleli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A very nice recent example is the system developed by Havaldar, Medioni, and Stein [5]. What distinguishes our system is the grouping processes we use at the higher levels which give certain exceptional capabilities.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A very nice recent example is the system developed by Havaldar, Medioni, and Stein [5]. What distinguishes our system is the grouping processes we use at the higher levels which give certain exceptional capabilities.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, mechanisms to achieve this without reducing the solution to model matching are rare. Some recent efforts in this direction are those of Nelson and Selinger [5,37] and Havaldar et al [34]. In these formalisms the object matching problem is intertwined with the higher-level grouping processes.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,35,36]) and have certainly contributed to the performance of these systems. However, the improvements that have been gained through grouping have not been fully quantified.…”
Section: A Simple Grouping Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%