2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0026384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual constancies and visual selection as predictors of realistic drawing skill.

Abstract: Traditionally, two theories have been proposed to understand realistic drawing: (a) a bottom-up perspective emphasizing accurate perception achieved by suppressing perceptual constancies and other sources of misperception, and (b) a top-down view emphasizing knowledge-facilitated selection of information important for object depiction. This study compares the predictive validity of the two. Artists and nonartists completed tasks measuring the ability to suppress shape and size constancies, a limited line-traci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
119
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(111 reference statements)
10
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the ability to overcome shape constancy (Cohen & Jones, 2008) and size constancy (Ostrofsky, Kozbelt, & Seidel, 2012), enhanced local processing of visual details (Chamberlain et al, 2013), field independence (Gaines, 1975), visual memory (Winner & Casey, 1992), and reduced attentional cost in switching between global and local aspects of visual displays (Chamberlain & Wagemans, 2015). Artists' perceptual advantages thus appear to span a range of quite different types of visual processing.…”
Section: Experts In Visual Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These include the ability to overcome shape constancy (Cohen & Jones, 2008) and size constancy (Ostrofsky, Kozbelt, & Seidel, 2012), enhanced local processing of visual details (Chamberlain et al, 2013), field independence (Gaines, 1975), visual memory (Winner & Casey, 1992), and reduced attentional cost in switching between global and local aspects of visual displays (Chamberlain & Wagemans, 2015). Artists' perceptual advantages thus appear to span a range of quite different types of visual processing.…”
Section: Experts In Visual Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity to the most important form-defining details may help an artist maximize viewers' ability to recognize a depicted object. Being able to conceptualize the key elements of a perspective space may help an artist establish the setting and relations among objects in a scene (Ostrofsky et al, 2012). Each of these skills is important in realistic drawing, though the perceptual processing demands are quite different in each case.…”
Section: Experts In Visual Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not possible to encode the infinite gradations in colour and light, or the enormous array of details of a face and thus much information must be omitted, leading to attention to the most valuable information. According to this view, previous research suggests that individual differences in visual perceptual processing underpin differences in realistic drawing ability (Cohen, 2005;Cohen & Bennett, 1997;Kozbelt, Seidel, El Bassiouny, Mark, & Owen, 2010;Ostrofsky, Kozbelt, & Seidel, 2012) and some studies have already drawn attention to local-global processing of drawings in ASD (Drake, Redash, Coleman, Haimson, & Winner, 2010;Drake & Winner, 2012;Mottron, Belleville, & Menard, 1999;Pring, Ryder, Crane, & Hermelin, 2010). Exploring potential correlates of drawing and perceptual expertise in ASD and non-ASD artists or TD people, these studies provided support for the notion that an ability to record and manipulate the details of the visual environment, i.e., local encoding, may be associated with better ability to draw.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illusions refer to "perceptual constancies", which affect performance even to the point of inaccuracy (Cohen & Earls, 2010). The size, shape, color, and brightness of an object might all be affected by perceptual constancies (Cohen & Jones, 2008;Day, 1972;McManus, Loo, Chamberlain, Riley, & Brunswick, 2011;Mitchell, Ropar, & Ackroyd, 2005;Ostrofsky, Kozbelt, & Cohen, 2015;Ostrofsky, Kozbelt, & Seidel, 2012;Perdreau & Cavanagh, 2011;Todorovic, 2002Todorovic, , 2010. Delusions pertain to an artist's knowledge of the object under observation, since this prior knowledge tends to guide an artist in her/his representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%