Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual completion of partly occluded contours during childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation of the results is consistent with former studies testing visuospatial integration skills more explicitly (e.g., Hadad & Kimchi, 2006, 2017Hadad et al, 2010;Kovacs, 2000). Consistent with our findings, these studies specifically suggest that the spatial interrelations of elements composing the same object are particularly critical for spatial integration skills in young children and, in some cases, much more so than the spatial relations between an object and its neighboring context (Hadad & Kimchi, 2018;Hadad et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This interpretation of the results is consistent with former studies testing visuospatial integration skills more explicitly (e.g., Hadad & Kimchi, 2006, 2017Hadad et al, 2010;Kovacs, 2000). Consistent with our findings, these studies specifically suggest that the spatial interrelations of elements composing the same object are particularly critical for spatial integration skills in young children and, in some cases, much more so than the spatial relations between an object and its neighboring context (Hadad & Kimchi, 2018;Hadad et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(Interestingly, responses on the lower part of each psychometric function (discriminating between each standard weight and its lighter comparisons) were noisier that those on the upper part of these functions. Noisier responses for the lower part of the function could be the result of a conflict between the perceptual representations and the response, in a manner similar to that found in other commonly employed perceptual paradigms (see, for example, (Hadad and Kimchi, 2018; Zemel et al, 2002). In our case, a conflict may have arisen between the response required (‘which is heavier?')…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Sixty-three persons in three groups participated in the experiment: 20 TD adults (mean age = 26.5; range = 24–30 years; 13 females), 26 adults diagnosed with ASD (mean age = 21.5; range = 18–28 years; eight females), and 17 TD children aged 4–5 years (mean age = 4.8; range = 3.9–5.1 years; 11 females; see Table 1) (We set the sample size in advance to match the sample size we typically use in our studies measuring perceptual processes in autism employing within-subject designs. Past experience suggests this sample size is sufficient to show clear differences between groups [e.g., Hadad and Ziv, 2015; Hadad et al, 2017; Hadad and Kimchi, 2018]). Participants had normal or corrected to normal vision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding call for caution in interpreting early developing looking patterns in infants. Such patterns may or may not indicate preferences for attended object 32 . Our findings also suggested caution in interpreting methods, such as ‘oculomotor genetic algorithms’, which equate fixation frequency and duration with aesthetic preference 55 , 56 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though we used simple dot patterns to avoid the confounding of prior visual experience, and we controlled other visual features such as balance and crowding scores for the picture pairs, a second possible reason for children’s failure to respond to symmetry stemmed from the competitive effect of dot proximity 31 , 32 (we thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this interpretation). To test this possibility, we calculated the correlation between the crowding score of each picture (see Table S1 ) and participants’ preference choices across the picture pairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%