2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual-based quality assessment for audio–visual services: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the recommendation [13], a non-symmetrical logistic function is used. Its mathematical expression is given by (1), where a and b are the parameters of the function, D is the distortion output of the QuID, and u min and u max are the minimum and maximum subjective scores for the analyzed event.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the recommendation [13], a non-symmetrical logistic function is used. Its mathematical expression is given by (1), where a and b are the parameters of the function, D is the distortion output of the QuID, and u min and u max are the minimum and maximum subjective scores for the analyzed event.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the mapping described by (1), with D equals to the duration of the impairment (t), the RMSE was 0.133 considering all the events of audio distortions.…”
Section: ) Audio Distortionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perceptual assessment for Quality of Experience (QoE) is becoming a critical issue in multimedia services [1]. Even though subjective quality assessment is the most reliable way to evaluate the perceived video quality, it is always expensive in the manpower and time costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of high importance when it comes to streaming services as well as real time applications for one-way or two-way communication of audio and video. Several studies have been published focused on both the effects of audio and video skewness and on reference models to handle synchronization in different ways, at IP level as well as application level [1,7,23,25]. It is shown that viewers perceive audio and video to be synchronized with an audio-to-video skew up to about 80 ms but also that there is a higher tolerance for video ahead of audio than vice versa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%