1996
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00162-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual and conceptual components in implicit and explicit stem completion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results replicate and extend previous studies of cross-modal stem completion in amnesia (Carlesimo, Marfia, Loasses, & Caltagirone, 1996;Graf et al, 1985). Priming was intact in the amnesic patients in the within- Note-The proportion of stems completed with targets and attributed to the study list is given in parentheses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These results replicate and extend previous studies of cross-modal stem completion in amnesia (Carlesimo, Marfia, Loasses, & Caltagirone, 1996;Graf et al, 1985). Priming was intact in the amnesic patients in the within- Note-The proportion of stems completed with targets and attributed to the study list is given in parentheses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, the level of processing effect was significant in stem completion, but failed to reach significance in word identification. Similar results-that is, larger priming effects after semantic than physical processing-have been reported by Carlesimo, Marfia, Loasses, and Caltagirone (1996) and Hamman & Squire (1996). Jenkins, Russo, and Parkin (1998) used a word fragment completion test to investigate two amnesic groups, a group of Korsakoff patients and a group with closed head injury.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Patients' cognitive profiles were evaluated extensively using a battery of tests (Table 3), including WAISr total intelligence quotient values (TIQ), immediate (IR) and delayed (DR) recall of Rey's 15 words [29], immediate visual memory (IVM) [30], forward (FDS) and backward digit span (BDS), forward (FC) and backward (BC) Corsi Test [31], Raven's 47 progressive matrices (PM) [32], freehand copying of drawings (CD) [33], temporal rules induction [34], and word fluency (WF) [35]. FCb patients had generally preserved cognitive patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%