2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4825(01)00035-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptron error surface analysis: a case study in breast cancer diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A learning rate of 0.05 (this constant regulates the speed of learning. A lower learning constant improves the classification model at the expense of the time it takes to process the variable) was used 31. This algorithm was used to distinguish between localized tumors and the corresponding metastases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A learning rate of 0.05 (this constant regulates the speed of learning. A lower learning constant improves the classification model at the expense of the time it takes to process the variable) was used 31. This algorithm was used to distinguish between localized tumors and the corresponding metastases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm was used to distinguish between localized tumors and the corresponding metastases. This methodology has previously been shown to be effective in predicting malignancy of breast cancer 31.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, BI-RADS attributes are collected by different physicians trained at different radiology centres providing values for a given BI-RADS attribute such as the mass shape, to a suspicious region seen in a mammogram. An artificial neural networks approach was proposed to deduce the diagnosis from BI-RADS descriptions [6,7]. Alternative approaches based on case-based reasoning and Bayesian networks were later proposed [8]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these approaches, the BI-RADS™ descriptors of abnormalities (assigned by radiologists) are used to classify abnormalities as malignant or benign and have shown to be quite accurate [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%