Perceptions towards disability among social work students in Israel: Development and validation of a new scale

Abstract

Over the last decades, the disability movement has been advocating for a paradigmatic shift in how disability is perceived and managed: from a medical or individual perspective focusing on the person's body and mind to a social perspective emphasizing the context and barriers of disability. However, we still know little about the perceptions of helping professionals, particularly social workers who work closely with disabled people. Thus, the aim of the current study is to develop and validate a scale-Perceptions Toward Disability Scale (PTDS)-to measure how social workers view disability: as an individual or social category. This paper describes the three phases of the scale's construction. First, scale items were formulated and its content validity was examined. Next, a pilot of 30 social workers completed a questionnaire and an initial exploratory factor analysis was conducted. In the third and main phase, the final draft was completed in 2016 by 565 Israeli social work students to assess its psychometric properties. Both exploratory and confirmatory factorial validity and discriminant validity analyses were conducted. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis revealed two distinct factors: an individual perspective of disability comprised of eight items (α = 0.77) and a social perspective of disability comprised of ten (α = 0.66). Subsequent analyses supported the scale's discriminant validity as indicated by the lack of an association between the Attitude Toward Disabled Persons Scale (ATDP) and the social model subscale (r = .13, p = .19) and by the weak negative relation with the individual model subscale (r = -.25, p = .01). These findings show that the PTDS possesses promising construct validity and provide support for its utility. This easy-to-administer instrument offers several practical benefits and can serve as a framework for further empirical research regarding social work practice with disabled people.

Israeli social workers’ recommendations on guardianship and supported decision-making: Examination of client and social worker factors.

“…Perceptions of disability were assessed using the Perceptions of Disability Scale (Holler & Werner, 2018) that measures the degree to which a social worker holds an individual versus a social perspective of disability. It is composed of two subscales, with eight items measuring the individual (e.g., “When social workers start treating disabled people, they must first determine their medical diagnosis”) and ten items measuring the social (e.g., “In their professional work with disabled people, social workers should place a major emphasis on the removal of social barriers”) perspective of disability.…”

Changing the paradigm of disability from stigma to equity in university social work education in Kyrgyzstan

“…This finding has wider implications not only in Central Asian countries that share a similar historical background with Kyrgyzstan but also in other parts of the world. The necessity of holistic disability studies and accommodation in the social work discipline has started to be addressed by scholars in different contexts (Holler & Werner, ; Morgan, ; Sniatecki, Pelz, & Gates, ). The ratification of the CRPD by 180 countries has meant that many countries face a variety of transformative challenges when social values and ethical standards do not comply with the principles of the CRPD.…”

Changing the paradigm of disability from stigma to equity in university social work education in Kyrgyzstan 1

“…This finding has wider implications not only in Central Asian countries that share a similar historical background with Kyrgyzstan but also in other parts of the world. The necessity of holistic disability studies and accommodation in the social work discipline has started to be addressed by scholars in different contexts (Morgan, 2012;Holler and Werner, 2018;Sniatecki et al, 2018). The ratification of the CRPD by 180 countries has meant that many countries face a variety of transformative challenges when social values and ethical standards do not comply with the principles of the CRPD.…”