Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UK

Abstract

Greenspaces facilitate well‐being benefits for humans in several ways including through cognitive restoration, physical exercise and social interaction. However, some groups are under‐represented in greenspaces, including women, older people, those with health conditions, people with lower socioeconomic status and people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and so are less likely to accrue these benefits. Using thematic analysis and semi‐structured interviews with 40 individuals from under‐represented groups in Leeds, UK, we explore (1) a range of perceived barriers to greenspace access, (2) how spending time in greenspace contributes to well‐being for these groups, (3) the perceived positive and negative aspects of greenspace, (4) what impact COVID‐19 had on access to greenspace and (5) how greenspaces could be improved. We also highlight inter‐group differences and how some barriers disproportionately affect some of the groups in this study. Safety concerns were particularly important for women and people with low incomes, which included problems with anti‐social behaviour (e.g. incivilities and disorder). Cultural barriers were also evident with ethnic minority participants often citing concerns about dogs and issues with visibility and prejudice. Participants desired physical improvements to the quality of greenspaces, along with easier access and transport options, changes in policy regarding dogs and increased security and park wardens to limit anti‐social behaviour. We argue that to increase visitation for under‐represented groups, upgrades in the physical environment must be coupled with harnessing community involvement and co‐design. Some group differences and tensions in greenspaces, and problems with anti‐social behaviours and safety concerns might be limited by more considerate planning and incorporating research findings that address these tensions through intergroup contact. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Can Campus Green Spaces Be Restorative? A Case Study from Tanzania

“…In addition, safety is seen as a vital qualitative trait of GSs by [194][195][196] implying that it should be taken into consideration when planning the establishment of open spaces. The feeling of safety could be secured by incorporating security measures such as regular presence of guards or surveillance by digital means [197]. Nonetheless, urban planners should firstly evaluate the supply and demand of GSs and then invest in reforming the available open spaces and quality aspects that will increase their use by the public.…”

Towards an understanding of quality and inclusivity in human‐environment experiences

“…Such 'representational barriers' in outdoors spaces have been well-documented (e.g., Neal, 2002;Rishbeth et al, 2022;Ward et al, 2023) and while these barriers are perhaps more pronounced in the US (Hoover & Lim, 2021), similar themes have been identified in the UK, where the countryside has been termed the 'white landscape' underwritten by norms of whiteness, where people of colour feel out of place (Agyeman, 1990;Garland & Chakraborti, 2006;Neal & Agyeman, 2006). In these contexts, while much of the perceived otherness is implicit, the dominant group may also use tacit strategies to maintain the status quo.…”