2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00508-020-01769-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions on the management of varices and on the use of albumin in patients with cirrhosis among GI specialists in Austria

Abstract: Summary Background Portal hypertension (PH) causes severe complications in patients with liver cirrhosis, such as variceal bleeding and ascites; however, data on the knowledge and perceptions on guideline recommendations for the management of varices and the use of albumin is scarce. Methods We designed two structured surveys on (i) the management of varices and (ii) the use of albumin for Austrian physicians of specialized Gastro-Intestinal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the rate of recommended NSBB use (26) was also low in our study, particularly in the context of secondary prophylaxis. This could be due to non-recorded contraindications or intolerance to NSBBs, but also to preferences of the respective treating physicians–as we have previously documented for Austria [ 42 , 43 ]. However, the impact of the synergistic effect of NSBB to individual co-medications (statin, metformin, or RASi) on bleeding has no significant effect (see Fig 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similarly, the rate of recommended NSBB use (26) was also low in our study, particularly in the context of secondary prophylaxis. This could be due to non-recorded contraindications or intolerance to NSBBs, but also to preferences of the respective treating physicians–as we have previously documented for Austria [ 42 , 43 ]. However, the impact of the synergistic effect of NSBB to individual co-medications (statin, metformin, or RASi) on bleeding has no significant effect (see Fig 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Kaplan-Meier curves of procedure-related bleeding events according to A size of varices, B serum bilirubin, C international normalized ratio, and D platelet count within 30 days after EBL. n (total numbers), d (days), PLT (platelets count in 10 9 /L), INR (international normalized ratio), mg/dL (milligram per deciliter), HR (Hazard-Ratio; statistical comparisons were performed by log-rank tests) and found that 47.1% of the surveyed persons would use NSBB for primary prophylaxis and 87.1% would perform combined treatment with NSBB and EBL for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding [41]. Thus, it seems that despite the recommendation to preferentially use NSBB for primary prophylaxis and the combination of NSBB and EBL in secondary prophylaxis, many physicians (or endoscopists) do not use NSBB according to their own preference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]. Though there are controversies for the effects of NSBBs, 81.5% of the physicians would use NSBBs for primary prevention of small varices in a survey [104]. For the primary prevention of small varices with risk factors (red signs and/or with CTP B or C), NSBBs are recommended in many guidelines [11,102,105].…”
Section: Primary Prophylaxis Of Small Varicesmentioning
confidence: 99%