Perceptions of the Rule of Law: Evidence on the Impact of Judicial Insulation*

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this article is to determine whether judicial insulation influences how individuals assess the rule of law. Methods. We employ panel data models using data collected by the World Bank and other sources to differentiate the influence of two kinds of judicial insulationdesigned (de jure) and implemented (de facto)-on individuals' perceptions of the viability of the rule of law in their country. Results. We find that while insulation (as designed) has no bearing on how individuals score rule of law strength, insulation (as implemented) increases individual assessments. Notably, we find that disappointment from unmet expectations-where institutional implementation falls short of design-negatively influences rule of law strength scores. Conclusions. We conclude that the degree to which expectations regarding the insulation and independence of the judiciary are met (or not met) can have important implications for how the viability of the rule of law is perceived.An abundant literature explores and assesses the rule of law's impact on governance (

Assessment of De Jure Judicial Independence of Constitutional Courts According to International Guidelines

“…118 Hamilton et al argue that courts depend on the assistance of other political authorities to enforce their decisions because they lack financial or physical means of coercion. 119 According to Cameron, judicial independence in this sense reflects a causal relationship between how judges 'think the underlying conflict they are adjudicating should be resolved and how it is resolved in practice' . 120 The criterion that is most relevant to this thesis is autonomy, because in order to assess the court's de facto independence through the criterion of influence, a degree of discontent by the regime with what the court decides is required, in order to see whether the regime prioritises obeying the court over maintaining its authoritarian interests or not.…”

Exploring the Path of Judicial Big Data to Enhance Data Governance Capability

“…Article 127 of the Civil Code stipulates that data is protected by law, but its legal concept and legal attributes are still controversial, hindering subsequent in-depth research [1][2]. Theoretical discussions and policy documents refer to "numbers," "data," "property," "assets," "elements," etc., but data is a legal concept, and each legal concept must have its own unique normative function, which should be based on its normative function, rather than purely defining its meaning based on daily experience or technical rules [3][4][5]. Data is different from the traditional object of property rights.…”