Perceptions of Safety Climate in Construction Projects between Workers and Managers/Supervisors in the Developing Country of Iran

Abstract

What are the different perceptions on safety climate (SC) by workers and managers/supervisors engaged in the construction industry of developing countries? Reconciling these two differing views is pivotal for mitigating and avoiding both the injured and fatal accidents in the construction industry, especially in those developing countries where safety conditions are poor and unpredictable, and safety measures are inadequate in most cases. To answer this research question, the collective perceptions of 118 construction workers and 123 managers/supervisors on the SC in construction projects in Iran were gleaned and investigated. In particular, these perceptions were initially collected by two different empirical surveys validated by a sample of university professors and construction managers and then analyzed through the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test and Bartlett’s test of sphericity under factor analysis, together with a one-sample t-test. Results indicated that “workers’ attitudes and perceptions”, “safety knowledge and training”, “working relationships and roles of colleagues”, and “workers’ risk perceptions” are important categories of SC factors perceived by construction workers, whereas “safety rules and management practices” is the essential category of SC factors discerned by managers/supervisors. The difference in perceptions between workers and managers/supervisors is considered to be beneficial for an overall understanding of SC in general and for developing countries in particular. Moreover, a series of effective suggestions for improving SC in the construction industry of developing countries are provided with reference to each category. The views of SC factors are reinforced as a social process combining the synergies of workers and managers/supervisors, as well as proper safety training to be pushed forward as an essential activity that should be incorporated in human resources development of construction organizations so as to improve the existing level of SC, leading to fewer accidents at the industry level.

Assessment of workplace safety climate among power sector employees: A comparative study of cross-culture employer in Pakistan

“…Workers’ Safety Priority and Risk Non-Acceptance (Dim 5) (LC: M = 3.00, SD = 0.428; MNC: M = 2.95, SD = 0.433, p = 0.345). Our study results are supported the findings of a study conducted in Iran, as well as another in Hong Kong, which showed that the importance of co-workers in the SC of the construction industry is more important than in developed countries [ 40 ]. In this regard, our own findings revealed a significant difference in the mean scores between workers employed by LCs and MNCs.…”

“…This highlights management’s reactive approach towards safety. According to Daniel et al [ 40 ] blame may be a barrier to learning, when accountability and criticism are dominant features of the work situation. Safety tends to be excessively managed through formal procedures as a means of self-preservation, thereby resulting in an increasingly prescriptive and inflexible compliance culture.…”

Development and Validation of the Online Interaction Scale in Organizational Context

“…Before conducting EFA, however, we needed to perform a Bartlett's test to determine whether the sample was suitable for EFA (Chan et al, 2021 ). The Bartlett's test found that the correlations, when taken collectively, were significant at the 0.001 level.…”

Analysis of Behavioral Strategies of Construction Safety Subjects Based on the Evolutionary Game Theory

“…The main contractor must reduce construction accidents and negative environmental impacts to comply with regulatory requirements and remain competitive [14,15]. The main body of the main contractor's safety behavior is the project management team, which consists of two parts, i.e., the old employees who are promoted from the grass-roots construction workers to the management and the university graduates with higher educational backgrounds [16].…”