Perceptions of police use of force: the importance of trust

Abstract

PurposeThe range of tactical force options available to police is increasing, while public debate about police use of force is never far from the headlines. This paper aims to examine what factors shape how people accept police use of force.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use two online experiments to test whether different force options affected judgments about the acceptability of police action and to explore the role of trust and legitimacy in people's judgments.FindingsThe authors found across both studies that respondents judged scenarios involving a weapon (baton, CS spray, Taser) as less acceptable compared to scenarios that did not (talking down, handcuffs), but they did not draw much distinction between the specific weapon used. In study 1, exposure to different police tactics had no effect on trust and legitimacy. In study 2, prior perceptions of trust were strong predictors of acceptability judgments.Originality/valueThere is a comparative paucity of British-based empirical research examining public attitudes toward different use of force resolutions by police. In this paper, the authors explore how use of force affects people's views of police at a time in which the nature and scope of force applications, how these are understood and indeed the basic enterprise of policing itself is being reconsidered and renegotiated.

KNOWCON 2022. Knowledge on Economics and Management: Conference Proceedings

“…The low credibility of the police negatively affects the effective fulfillment of goals and tasks, as citizens refuse to cooperate (Boateng, 2013). Credibility is a prerequisite for accepting the method of police intervention (Kyprianides et al, 2020).…”

An Institutional Perspective to Understand Latin America’s High Levels of Homicide

“…Political science research about institutions has also begun to examine how issues of institutional strength, legitimacy and effectiveness influence the expectations of individuals and shape their behaviours (Lafree and Tseloni 2006;Levitsky and Murillo 2009;De Boer and Bosetti 2015). Additionally, a wide body of other research has shown that individuals are influenced by feelings related to trust and legitimacy towards institutions (Eisner and Nivette 2013;Tankebe 2013;Bradford et al 2017;Kyprianides et al 2021), including how legitimacy is negatively related to homicide (Eisner and Nivette 2013;Dawson 2017). Legitimacy is the public acceptance of the right of the criminal justice system to wield power and define behaviour (Bottoms and Tankebe 2012;Hough et al 2013).…”

Artificial fairness? Trust in algorithmic police decision-making

“…People who trust the police are also more willing to accept their vulnerability in relation to police-to place their trust in police-because they expect officers to be willing and able to behave fairly and effectively (Hamm et al, 2017). Trust (and/or associated constructs such as confidence and legitimacy) appears to be an important factor shaping public support for police powers, including the police potential for, and use of, force (Bradford et al, 2017;Kyprianides et al, 2021) as well as new technologies such as Body Worn Video (Lawrence et al, 2021) and the use of "big data" (Lee & Park, 2021). Trust can act as a heuristic, providing a mental shortcut towards a decision or judgement in situations where people know little about the power or technology in question (which is often the case in policing and when AI is involved).…”