Perceptions of health care professionals of the medical aspects of driving safety: An electronic survey

Abstract

Background: Driving a motor vehicle is a highly coordinated process involving a series of learned reflexes and carefully made conscious decisions. The evaluation of an individual's ability to drive is a legal and safety necessity. Various factors such as age and illnesses can affect individual's ability to drive. Objectives: The aims of the current survey were to ascertain the level of awareness among medical professionals of fitness to drive and to evaluate their perception of some select medical aspects of fitness to drive and regulatory aspects of driving. Materials and Methods: This is a survey of 520 health care professionals addressing select clinical and regulatory issues regarding medical aspects of driving. A de novo questionnaire of four domains was developed based on the study objectives. The target population was identified from pooled lists of health care contacts. A widely used web-based commercial survey management service was utilized. Results: Out of the 520 respondents, males and females constituted 63.5% and 36.5% respectively. Country of residence of respondents include: UAE (55.2%), other Arabian Gulf countries (13.3%), rest of MENA region (14.8%), Western Europe and North America (12.3%) and other regions (1.9%). 47.4% of the respondents were hospital doctors while 16.4% were primary care physicians. 57.3% of the respondents thought the age threshold which requires medical assessment ranged between 60-70 years. There was a wide range of intervals of reissuing licenses (1-5 years) in countries where restrictions apply above a certain age. 92.5% identified a list of conditions as declarable to authorities. More than half of respondents considered the following conditions as relevant and declarable to the authorities in a descending order of frequency: epilepsy, visual impairment, alcoholism and drug dependency, blackouts and syncope, dementia, stroke with hemiplegia and insulin-treated Diabetes. The principal safety concerns for driving with diabetes were addressed by 94.6% of respondents. 79.3% identified hypoglycemia and 18.1% identified visual impairment (diabetic retinopathy) as major barriers to safe driving. 85.1% of respondents thought that the driving risks to be higher in insulin-treated (85.1%) than in sulphonylurea-treated (9.6%) diabetic patients. The majority of respondents believe that doctors have an obligation to alert their patients about diseases that risk their driving abilities and drivers have an obligation to provide all required details to their insurance companies. Confidentiality issues were addressed in the questionnaire and 316 (68.4%) thought that both physicians and diabetic patients need to report relevant information to regulatory driving authorities and insurance companies. Conclusion: This survey indicates that there is a considerable awareness among health care professionals regarding medical conditions that may affect an individual's ability to drive. Furthermore, it see...

Attitudes of physicians and scientists to peer reviewing for biomedical journals: A survey from the Middle East and Africa

“…Responses on a 5-point Likert Scale: Not at all important, slightly important, moderately important, very important, and extremely important review has emerged as a vital basis for scientific publishing and a defining indicator of journal quality and scholarly work integrity. [16,17] Journals depend on independent reviewers to enhance the quality of submitted manuscripts and guide their publication decision-making process. Simply put, peer review has become a critical cornerstone in fine academia and a driving force for the quality enhancement of published scholarly activities.…”

A global survey of licensing restrictions for drivers with diabetes

“…There was an emphasis on reviewing risk to driving safety by the identification of specific problems such as the frequency of hypoglycaemia and the presence of visual deficits, impaired hypoglycaemia awareness, diabetic neuropathy and neuromuscular incoordination. However, a recent survey of physicians in the Gulf region demonstrated variable perceptions of the medical aspects of fitness to drive, 27 and an international study of the quality of national-level guidelines for determining medical fitness to drive demonstrated substantive variability in the quality of these guidelines, and rigour of development has been shown to be a relative weakness. 28 When a driver's treatment has to be changed to insulin, in most countries the driver is allowed to continue to drive without any alteration to licensing entitlements; only a few countries require specific criteria to be met before a driver commencing insulin therapy is allowed to retain the driving licence.…”