2014
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2014.881348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
82
0
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
82
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Há estudos empíricos, por exemplo, que demonstram que o uso de métodos alternativos de avaliação permite uma aprendizagem mais eficaz e uma maior motivação por parte dos estudantes (TANG et al, 1999;SEGERS;THURLINGS, 2008). Por outro lado, o modo como a avaliação é operacionalizada influencia a motivação e a aprendizagem dos alunos (BIRENBAUM; FELDMAN, 1998;FERNANDES;LIMA 2012;WEBBER, 2012;FLORES et al, 2014;, sendo vista como "uma ferramenta para a aprendizagem" (DOCHY; MCDOWELL, 1997).…”
Section: Online Peer Assessment No Ensino Superiorunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Há estudos empíricos, por exemplo, que demonstram que o uso de métodos alternativos de avaliação permite uma aprendizagem mais eficaz e uma maior motivação por parte dos estudantes (TANG et al, 1999;SEGERS;THURLINGS, 2008). Por outro lado, o modo como a avaliação é operacionalizada influencia a motivação e a aprendizagem dos alunos (BIRENBAUM; FELDMAN, 1998;FERNANDES;LIMA 2012;WEBBER, 2012;FLORES et al, 2014;, sendo vista como "uma ferramenta para a aprendizagem" (DOCHY; MCDOWELL, 1997).…”
Section: Online Peer Assessment No Ensino Superiorunclassified
“…Estudos empíricos têm demonstrado que a utilização de métodos alternativos proporciona uma aprendizagem mais eficaz e motivadora (TANG et al, 1999;BIRENBAUM;FELDMAN, 1998). Outros estudos reportam a sua relevância, mas destacam a ligação entre métodos alternativos de avaliação e aspetos ligados à autonomia dos estudantes e ao papel do feedback (FLORES et al, 2014).…”
Section: Online Peer Assessment No Ensino Superiorunclassified
“…In most European countries, changes occurred in teaching, learning and assessment process with the implementation of the Bologna Process (Flores et al, 2015;Pereira et al, 2016). In addition to the Bologna Declaration (1999), the Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Communiqué (2009) stresses the promotion of a learner-centred learning approach in order to develop students' competences for the real life.…”
Section: Assumptions Of Assessment After the Implementation Of The Bomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A learner centred-assessment approach emphasises the student as the centre of the process promoting the active knowledge construction (Webber, 2012). This approach is based on the use of different methods and modes of assessment such as project, portfolio, self-and peer assessment, simulations, amongst others (Flores et al, 2015) which enable the development of skills such as autonomy, collaborative work and critical thinking (Sambell & McDowell, 1998), promoting feedback and the students' motivation (Huba & Freed, 2000). Nevertheless, research is needed on changes of educational practices as a result of the Bologna Process (Wihlborg & Teelken, 2014) and on students' and teachers' perceptions and practices of assessment and learning (Pereira et al, 2016).…”
Section: Assumptions Of Assessment After the Implementation Of The Bomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reorganisation of higher education systems in Europe has challenged the ways of looking at curricula but also to teaching, learning and assessment (Flores & Veiga Simão, 2007;Flores, Veiga Simão, Barros, & Pereira, 2015;Simão, Santos, & Costa, 2003). Among the key features of the Bologna Process is the emphasis on a student-centred approach involving new forms of teaching and learning with tutorial support (Leuven / Louvain-la-Neuve Communiqué, 2009) and the use of innovative methods that promote participatory learning and the development of critical thinking (Bucharest Communiqué, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%