Perceptions of a Spanish language Reproductive Health Self-assessment Tool Among Spanish-Speaking Women at a Federally Qualified Health Center

Bello, Jennifer K.; Chavez, Jairo; Liederbauer, Victoria; Poston, L.; Stones, Rachel E.; Stulberg, Debra

doi:10.1007/s10903-020-00988-6

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The majority of PIS/RLPs were employed verbally during clinical encounters (15 RLPs in 27 papers) (6, 16, 17, 22, 24, 25, 28–36, 38–42, 44, 45, 48, 49, 52–54), five were self-completed (written) RLPs studied in seven papers (14, 15, 21, 37, 46, 47, 50) and six were digital RLPs (13, 19, 20, 26, 43, 51), although one was designed to be used/completed with a midwife (26) and one was linked to primary care (51). Several PIS/RLP were implemented in different formats, for example, the OKQ, FPQ/RepLI and Moos were all asked both verbally during clinical encounters and self-completed (written).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Qualitative findings showed that RLPs were a valuable prompt for women to think critically about pregnancy intentions and related actions (17, 23) as they were hesitant to raise the topic themselves (15, 17, 23) and therefore preferred providers to raise the issue (17, 23). However, it was vital that providers did this, and gave the subsequent advice, in a non-judgemental, unbiased way that respected autonomy (17, 23, 32).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Across different settings and populations, the FPQ/RepLI (29, 30), RH-SAT (15), PATH (25), FPQ (50) and OKQ (37, 50) were all shown to help participants talk to their provider about their reproductive goals, or to lead to an overall increase in satisfaction (from 81% to 97%, p=0.04) and communication (from 77% to 94%, p=0.06) (37). Where comparisons were made between tools, PATH (25), FPQ (50) and questions about reproductive service needs (32, 49) were preferred to OKQ.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A scoping review of the format, content, effectiveness and acceptability of reproductive life planning tools

Stewart,

Noh,

Pathak

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionA Reproductive Life Plan (RLP) is a set of questions that encourage patients to reflect on their reproductive goals and the actions needed to achieve them. This scoping review of the published and grey literature aims to map the evidence on currently available RLPs.MethodsWe searched four databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Scopus) and used Google to search the grey literature, the search terms were; “reproductive life plan$” OR “reproductive plans$” OR “pregnancy intention screening”. Data were extracted on target audience, format, content, behaviour change theory, features, effectiveness and acceptability.Results44 published papers and 18 grey literature sources were included. 21 RLPs were discussed in the published papers and 17 in the grey literature. Most RLPs came from the USA. Most RLPs in published papers were asked verbally, while all RLPs in the grey literature were self-completed; there were six digital RLPs. Most ask whether an individual wants children, some then ask about number and timing of children, and contraception. Grey literature RLPs also asked about lifestyle and health.DiscussionThe concept of developing an RLP is acceptable to people of reproductive age and healthcare professionals. There was a lot of consistency in the questions asked, however, there is limited data on effectiveness and only three tools, all digital, incorporated behaviour change theory.ConclusionA digital RLP that builds on the evidence for existing tools and integrates appropriate theory could result in the realisation of the potential that RLPs are theorised to deliver.

show abstract