2019
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.17181.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions and use of technology in older people with ophthalmic conditions

Abstract: Background: Technologies such as mobile applications are increasingly being developed for patients to help manage their clinical conditions. However there is a paucity of information confirming the capacity or willingness of older patients with ophthalmic complaints to engage with such computer applications. The aim of this paper is to assess the perception and use of a range of common computing technologies by older ophthalmic patients, in order to guide future ophthalmology-specific development and clinical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 38 Patterns of technology usage suggest older ophthalmic patients frequently use technology, for example, 88.5% of people aged 66–79 years attending Manchester Royal Eye Hospital report regularly using technologies including desktop and laptop computers. 39 Many older adults aged 65 years and over use devices relating to healthcare, such as glucose and cardiac monitoring tools. 40 It is perhaps most appropriate to expect large variability in abilities relating to technology among older populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 38 Patterns of technology usage suggest older ophthalmic patients frequently use technology, for example, 88.5% of people aged 66–79 years attending Manchester Royal Eye Hospital report regularly using technologies including desktop and laptop computers. 39 Many older adults aged 65 years and over use devices relating to healthcare, such as glucose and cardiac monitoring tools. 40 It is perhaps most appropriate to expect large variability in abilities relating to technology among older populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a period of direct training with home-based technology was regarded positively, suggesting such training can provide patients with a helpful rehabilitation framework. Despite an increasing number of visually impaired adults engaging with technology, 57 it is inevitable that some individuals will have underlying concerns about their technical readiness to operate devices at home. An assessment of individual selfefficacy regarding health management and aptitude for telerehabilitation may, therefore, help to prioritise individuals for whom this approach is most likely to be acceptable and successful.…”
Section: Measuring Benefits and Acceptability Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home self-testing of vision has been extensively explored and many systems exist for this, but definitive clinical validation for such testing is often lacking [12]. Problems can arise, for example, from access to and difficulties in setting up and using technologies, lack of psychophysical consistency of different device screens, maintaining correct distance and algorithm accuracy [13]. In practice, most patients arrive at their hospital appointments without a home measure of their current acuity and the system we describe allows a means of measuring this without significant risk of exposure to infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%