2014
DOI: 10.5958/2231-6728.2014.00904.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions and Preferences of Different Teaching and Evaluation Methodologies Amongst First Year Undergraduate Medical Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intrigued by the variations due to the differences in the level of interactivity and the role of the learner, we hypothesized that the effectiveness of virtual versus face-to-face mode of conduct, as perceived by the postgraduate students, in facilitating their overall learning may differ across the spectrum of leader-centered and participant-centered academic activities. The perception of the students remains one of the most accepted, cogent, and unfailing criteria to understand the learning experience of a given strategy ( 24 ) and helps us to gain insights regarding the sustainability of the newer strategies ( 19 ). However, there was an unavailability of validated questionnaires to assess the student’s perception of the effectiveness of virtual versus face-to-face conduct of postgraduate academic sessions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrigued by the variations due to the differences in the level of interactivity and the role of the learner, we hypothesized that the effectiveness of virtual versus face-to-face mode of conduct, as perceived by the postgraduate students, in facilitating their overall learning may differ across the spectrum of leader-centered and participant-centered academic activities. The perception of the students remains one of the most accepted, cogent, and unfailing criteria to understand the learning experience of a given strategy ( 24 ) and helps us to gain insights regarding the sustainability of the newer strategies ( 19 ). However, there was an unavailability of validated questionnaires to assess the student’s perception of the effectiveness of virtual versus face-to-face conduct of postgraduate academic sessions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Literature however revealed that students perception is one of the most powerful and highly accepted criteria to determine their learning experience of a new strategy and to predict sustainability of that strategy. 11,12 The results of our study showed virtual journal club was extremely convenient to vast majority (86.62%, n=298) of our residents. Most (81.39%, n=280) of our residents agreed that VJC improved their knowledge, attitude and skills that supported them in their delivery of patient care.…”
Section: Journal Clubmentioning
confidence: 69%