Perception Study of the Conservation and Utilization of Linpan Cultural Landscape Heritage: The Case of Dujiangyan City

Abstract

Linpan has a long history of over 2,300 years and is a unique cultural landscape heritage of the Chengdu Plain derived from the Dujiangyan hydraulic engineering. As urbanization has gradually degraded the Linpan landscape over the past decades, the government is helping to revitalize the local countryside by preserving it. The purpose of this study was to understand the perceptions of Linpan indigenous villagers about its conservation and use, and to investigate the differences in their perceptions and the factors influencing them. The city of Dujiangyan, located at the source of the Dujiangyan Irrigation Area, was taken as the case study area, and a questionnaire survey and quantitative analysis were adopted. The study shows that Linpan indigenous villagers generally support the protection of water systems and fields; Linpan’s vacation and health and wellness functions are recognized by villagers; and regarding Linpan land use, villagers generally prefer to take the form of land market transfer and are willing to transfer arable land and homestead. This also confirms differences in the villagers’ perceptions of the conservation and utilization of Linpan in different locations due to their divergent characteristics. This study provides a reference for the villagers’ perspective on the planning and action of Linpan conservation and use, suggesting the importance of villagers’ distinguishing factors in cultural landscape revitalization.

Comparative analysis of urban and rural housing reconstruction post 9.21 Chi-Chi and 5.12 Wenchuan earthquakes: complexity, challenges and policy exploration

“…Similarly, in the Dongshi District of Taiwan, nearly 300 communities collapsed during the 9.21 earthquake, but only over a hundred were rebuilt in time, with the remaining portion either terminated or experiencing longer reconstruction periods (Zhan, 2022). From the case of Dujiangyan City, it could be found that the more diverse the choices, the more likely the original community is to split (Umel et al, 2024). Especially for residents who choose the Government-led Unified Planning and Construction model, even though they have lived in the same community for over a decade, still lack a sense of neighborhood due to being strangers before the disaster.…”