2005
DOI: 10.1007/11596356_82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of Wearable Computers for Everyday Life by the General Public: Impact of Culture and Gender on Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, women considered its usefulness most important when referring to the health dimension. Other studies coincide with these results, where women have a lower use attitude than men [24,45,50,51]. On the contrary, Wu et al [52] conducted a study involving 120 Amazon consumers.…”
Section: Mobile Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast, women considered its usefulness most important when referring to the health dimension. Other studies coincide with these results, where women have a lower use attitude than men [24,45,50,51]. On the contrary, Wu et al [52] conducted a study involving 120 Amazon consumers.…”
Section: Mobile Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We also recognise the transferability of our findings is limited by our single culture sample. As noted in our review of related work, attitudes to self-presentation are influenced by culture and gender [26,27,25], as well as individual aspects [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior works have highlighted cultural differences in interest to adopt wearable technologies [25,26]. For example, Wang et al [25] noted that elderly Chinese and Korean participants exhibited higher interest in using technology to connect with others than their US counterparts.…”
Section: Cultural and Gender Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Factors influencing the adoption of innovations with wearable sensors can be broadly categorized into general, physical and software characteristics. The general factors presented in the literature include the high price associated with emerging technology [33], culture and gender for specific wearables [34], social influence [35] and personal preferences [36,37].…”
Section: Individual Domain: Wearablesmentioning
confidence: 99%