2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of strength from 3D faces is linked to facial cues of physique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
71
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
10
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each head model could then be described with a relatively small number of principal components (PCs). Next two groups were defined, one of 10 individuals low in BMI and one of 10 individuals high in BMI [57]. Owing to the sexual dimorphism in body composition and build, BMI scores were separately calculated for men and women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each head model could then be described with a relatively small number of principal components (PCs). Next two groups were defined, one of 10 individuals low in BMI and one of 10 individuals high in BMI [57]. Owing to the sexual dimorphism in body composition and build, BMI scores were separately calculated for men and women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 'BMI axis' in face space was then defined by the low and high BMI average face shapes. Each face in the sample was projected onto this axis, and the projection value defined the facial BMI score [57]. Average values for each PC were separately calculated for men and women with low and high BMI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Base faces were manipulated in their masculinity by applying or subtracting the linear difference between the average male and female face shape from a set of faces used in a previous study (Holzleitner and Perrett 2016). With this difference corresponding to 100%, each base face was feminized and masculinized to cover a range of −100% to +200% sexually dimorphic shape in seven steps of 50%, resulting in 28 stimulus faces.…”
Section: Stimulus Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 One of the four base faces at the seven different levels of masculinity. Masculinity transforms were based on the difference in face shape between an average male (composite of 50 men) and an average female face (composite of 68 women, Holzleitner et al 2016) as missing. Participants rated their own attractiveness to the sex they were attracted to on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1-Below average/Not so attractive to 7-Above average/Very attractive.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, facial masculinity is associated with measures of men's upper body strength (Fink, Neave, & Seydel, 2007;Holzleitner & Perrett, 2015;Sell et al, 2009;Windhager, Schaefer, & Fink, 2011) and behavioural dominance Pound, Penton-Voak, & Surridge, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%