2001
DOI: 10.1179/146431501790561061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of prosodic features by children with cochlear implants: is it sufficient for understanding meaning differences in language?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern of prosodic improvement in our study is also in line with the results of Klieve and Jeanes [16] who detected considerable improvement of prosodic skills of children with hearing impairment after a 10-week intervention program targeting prosodic perception skills such as affect, loudness, question and statement, chunking and stress and reported their effect on the improvement of prosodic production abilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pattern of prosodic improvement in our study is also in line with the results of Klieve and Jeanes [16] who detected considerable improvement of prosodic skills of children with hearing impairment after a 10-week intervention program targeting prosodic perception skills such as affect, loudness, question and statement, chunking and stress and reported their effect on the improvement of prosodic production abilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Speech training programs aim at providing activities targeting auditory discrimination, imitation, and eliciting appropriate speech production. Klieve and Jeanes [16] applied an intervention program that included activities focusing on tone and affect, questions and statements, intensity, stress, chunking, and grammar. The program activities highlighted meaning distinctions delivered by speech prosody.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is given by the fact that, when starting an utterance, the subglottal air pressure in the speaker is higher than towards its end. In accordance with these studies, previous research has shown positive effects of emphasized prosodic features in language comprehension (Klieve and Jeanes 2001) and in perception of interrogative forms (See et al 2013) in children with hearing deficits.…”
Section: The Human Ability To Identify and Produce Phonemes (Within Csupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This applies across a range of tasks tapping into, for example, emotional prosody (Hopyan-Misakyan et al, 2009;Nakata et al, 2012) and question vs. statement intonation (Peng et al, 2008). Despite the importance of prosodic stress for the segmentation of speech, there are only a handful of studies assessing prosodic stress perception in children with CIs (Word and sentence stress: Klieve & Jeanes, 2001;Most & Peled, 2007;O ' Halpin, 2010. Word stress: Lyxell et al, 2009, Titterington et al, 2006.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%