1980
DOI: 10.1126/science.7434014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of Numbers by Human Infants

Abstract: Infants are capable of discriminating, representing, and remembering particular small numbers of items. A perceptual enumeration process called subitizing, present in 2-year-olds, probably underlies this capacity. This finding indicates that some number capacity is present before the onset of verbal counting, and it suggests that verbal counting may have precursors present during infancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
289
0
28

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 588 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
13
289
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Such modality-invariance is in line with a model of number processing that postulates an abstract supramodal internal representation of numerical quantity (Dehaene and Changeux, 1993). Finally, the absence of increased activation in the left hemisphere linguistic perisylvian areas for numerosity estimation with respect to perceptual matching, indicates the relatively low involvement of linguistic operations in numerosity estimation, in line with the fact that non-human animals as well as pre-verbal infants are able to perform similar numerosity estimation tasks (Davis and Pérusse, 1988;Gallistel and Gelman, 1992;Starkey and Cooper, 1980). What is the nature of the computations performed by the frontal and parietal areas of the right hemisphere?…”
Section: An A-modal Right Hemisphere Superiority For Approximate Numesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such modality-invariance is in line with a model of number processing that postulates an abstract supramodal internal representation of numerical quantity (Dehaene and Changeux, 1993). Finally, the absence of increased activation in the left hemisphere linguistic perisylvian areas for numerosity estimation with respect to perceptual matching, indicates the relatively low involvement of linguistic operations in numerosity estimation, in line with the fact that non-human animals as well as pre-verbal infants are able to perform similar numerosity estimation tasks (Davis and Pérusse, 1988;Gallistel and Gelman, 1992;Starkey and Cooper, 1980). What is the nature of the computations performed by the frontal and parietal areas of the right hemisphere?…”
Section: An A-modal Right Hemisphere Superiority For Approximate Numesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Numerosity is an abstract property of a set, since it is independent of the sensory attributes of its members and of the physical parameters of the set, such as shape, luminance, density, duration or frequency, even if it often co-varies with these parameters. Despite its abstractness, the ability to make approximate judgements on numerosity (estimation) does not depend on learning a symbolic system, as it spontaneously emerges in pre-linguistic infants (Antell and Keating, 1983;Starkey and Cooper, 1980;Xu and Spelke, 2000), and is observable in non-human species (Brannon and Terrace, 2000;Church and Meck, 1984;Davis and Pérusse, 1988). When a symbolic system -such as counting words -becomes available, exact numerosity judgements can extend to numerosities larger than those correctly estimated by infants and other species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As some researchers assume, this implies that infants can already differentiate between discrete quantities (see Antell & Keating, 1983;Bijeljac-Babic, Bertoncini, & Mehler, 1993;Huntley-Fenner & Cannon, 2000;Starkey & Cooper, 1980;Wynn, 1992; for large numerosities: Xu, Spelke, & Goddard, 2005). Others believe that infants only differentiate between the spatial extent of quantities but not between discrete amounts (see Clearfield & Mix, 1999Feigenson, Carey, & Spelke, 2002;Mix, Huttenlocher, & Levine, 1996Rousselle, Palmers, & Noël, 2004;Simon, Hespos, & Rochat, 1995; for small numerosities: Xu, Spelke, & Goddard, 2005).…”
Section: Level I: Number-word Sequence Isolated From Quantities (Basimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De forma mais robusta, os estudos usando metodologias de habituação demonstraram que os bebês são capazes de identificar mudanças numéricas em conjuntos com pequenas quantidades (Antell & Keating, 1983;Starkey & Cooper, 1980;Starkey, Spelke, & Gelman, 1990;Strauss & Curtis, 1981, 1984 e em conjuntos com grandes quantidades (Xu & Spelke, 2000). E, ainda, são capazes de parear de forma equivalente o número de sons ouvidos com o número de objetos de um conjunto (Starkey & Spelke, 1983) e demonstram conhecimento de resultados de adições e subtrações simples (Wynn, 1992b(Wynn, , 1992c.…”
Section: São Numéricas As Representações Quantitativasunclassified