2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of ‘mothers of beneficiaries’ regarding a rural community based hearing screening service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial search yielded 674 articles, which reduced to 420 after removal of duplicates (see online supplementary table 3). After screening of abstracts, 356 studies were excluded and after full-text review a further 30, leaving 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria 21 22 30–65. Further details are in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart (figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The initial search yielded 674 articles, which reduced to 420 after removal of duplicates (see online supplementary table 3). After screening of abstracts, 356 studies were excluded and after full-text review a further 30, leaving 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria 21 22 30–65. Further details are in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart (figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies have been published in the past decade (since 2008, n=30), with no relevant studies published before 1980. Studies took place in South Asia (n=13),30 36 43–45 48 55–59 61 65 Oceania (n=7),21 38 39 41 42 62 63 North America (n=7),22 35 37 47 49 50 60 South America (n=6)31–34 40 64 or Africa (n=5) 46 51–54…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is safe to say that the RBSK is bound to fail unless capacity is built up rapidly. A feedback study done to evaluate the parents' perception to universal neonatal hearing screening gave positive results [20]. Universal hearing screening programs have lowered that age of identification of congenital deafness to 9.59 months, however it is still lower than the target of 3 months as per JCIH [7,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies from India 22 and Nigeria 23 show that, after two weeks of training, community health workers can also perform automated neonatal screening using such devices. Screening in neonates by community health workers using a low-cost rattle made from wood and metal spheres has also been described in India, 24 and in children and adults using a semi-automated mobile phone application (following only a few hours of training) in South Africa.…”
Section: Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%