Perception of Ecosystem Services in Constituting Multi-Functional Landscapes in Slovakia

Abstract

Landscape provides many services for human wellbeing through its mosaic of ecosystems. Although different landscape spatial structures limit some access to these services for local residents, their demand for landscape benefits creates a crucial component in landscape planning. Herein, we evaluate the ecosystem service supply from landscape structures in four different areas of Slovakia and we identify the public preferences for these services. This evaluation was assisted by expert-based ecosystem services (ES) matrix assessment and feedback from experts and key local stakeholders. The associated land cover assessment revealed that although forests are the most important for ES delivery, followed by extensive agricultural mosaics, cultural services have the highest average supply value. In contrast, the experts and local stakeholders considered that provisioning services were the most important of all ES groups because of products available from arable land. The overall public awareness of benefits provided by nature proved relatively high, and this is a good sign for the development of multi-functional landscapes. The comparison of study sites revealed that even stakeholders living in intensively used land, with its overall low ES supply, assessed ES as very important in general. The general public could therefore be included in environmental planning to promote a more multi-functional landscape. In addition, the analysis herein will communicate gained insights to the local planners and decision-makers and confirm the importance of this ES participatory approach using top-down methodology. This may require the following measures in Slovakia: establishing an interdisciplinary group of experts for regular assessment of strategic landscape planning documents and regulatory instruments, developing key directives which establish well-balanced participatory procedures, improving open local government, and supporting down-scaled implementation of integrated landscape planning in cooperation with local action groups.

Who’s Missing Out? Supply-demand mismatch analysis of urban ecosystem services in Singapore

“…analysis revealed that, with the exception of noise abatement ES, spatially explicit ES mismatches have no signi cant correlation with Singapore residents' perception towards ES importance. This contradicts previous perception-based studies in the cases of Indonesia(Muhamad et al, 2014), Ecuador(Aguado et al, 2018) and Slovakia(Bezák et al, 2020), which suggested the signi cance of one's lived experiences of unmet ES demand or absence of ES supply in heightening ES awareness and perception.In particular, the positive correlation between the mismatch value of noise abatement ES at 400m and its importance rating, runs directly opposite to this reasoning. It implies that people who experience a more negative mismatch, value the ES less; while those who experience a more positive mismatch, value it more.…”

Integrating Ecosystem Services into Land-Use Modeling to Assess the Effects of Future Land-Use Strategies in Northern Ghana

“…• ES and indicators were identified relevant to actual land-use activities in the local context: the multifunctionality of land-use systems can be considered [94,95].…”

Local Action Groups and Sustainable Development Agenda: Case Study of Regional Perspectives From Czechia

“…Yet this can be problematic if top-down agendas do not meet local needs and perspectives, especially if the settings of financial and legal frameworks for the policy implementation are questionable (Konečný et al, 2021). Despite the fact that rural areas are often seen as important mainly in the local and regional context, their ability to provide ecosystem services and contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation makes them important actors with large sustainability potential even at the global level (Bezák et al, 2020). Therefore, our main research objective is to identify how LAGs perceive various strategies related to sustainable development, how they reflect the importance of the SDGs for their region, and how they anticipate their own contribution to the SDGs' fulfillment in the local circumstances.…”