1972
DOI: 10.1037/h0033305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of cartoon humor as a function of familiarity and anxiety level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the findings reported here for trait anxiety, both null results and those in the opposite direction have been observed in two research reports that investigated similar hypotheses but used procedures that encouraged conscious preference formation ( Schick et al, 1972 ; Campbell and McKeen, 2011 ). A possible relationship between intentionality and the nature of preference formation may explain this apparent inconsistency.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the findings reported here for trait anxiety, both null results and those in the opposite direction have been observed in two research reports that investigated similar hypotheses but used procedures that encouraged conscious preference formation ( Schick et al, 1972 ; Campbell and McKeen, 2011 ). A possible relationship between intentionality and the nature of preference formation may explain this apparent inconsistency.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…First, because a mere exposure effect is more likely when novel stimuli are presented (Gaudreau & Peretz, 1999;Schick, McGlynn, & Woolam, 1972), the relative novelty of the stimuli for the participants who had not followed Hashimoto and the other two politicians before the treatment could have constituted a lenient test of the mere exposure effect. Second, an alternative explanation is that Hashimoto's increased feeling thermometer score was produced by online processing (Lodge, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mere exposure effect has been demonstrated in more than 200 experiments, the influence of individual differences in susceptibility to it has been tested only eight times. Of the individual difference variables examined, only anxiety (Schick, McGlynn, & Woolam, 1972), boredom proneness (Bornstein, Kale, & Cornell, 1990), and toleranceintolerance of ambiguity (Crandall, 1968) have been found to relate to the mere exposure effect. Persons with high anxiety, low boredom proneness, and intolerance of ambiguity prefer the familiarized to the unfamiliarized more than do their counterparts on these individual difference variables.…”
Section: Do Individual Differences Moderate the Mere Exposure Effect?mentioning
confidence: 99%