OBJECTIVE:The prevalence of obesity varies considerably between countries when compared using the common international standard. This study investigated body size and body composition in Tongan and Australian Caucasian adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparative study. SUBJECTS: A total of 543 Tongans and 393 Australians. MEASUREMENTS: Weight, height, waist and hip circumference, four skinfolds, midarm circumference, elbow breadth, and body composition by bioelectrical impedance using sex-and ethnic-specific regression equations. RESULTS: Tongan women (mean body mass index (BMI) AE s.e. ¼ 32.6 AE 0.4 kg=m 2 ) were larger than Australian women (BMI ¼ 25.8 AE 0.4 kg=m 2 ), with more fat-free mass (FFM; 52.2 AE 0.4; 42.6 AE 0.3 kg), fat mass (37.1 AE 0.7; 26.6 AE 0.8 kg) and percentage body fat (%fat) (40.5 AE 0.4; 37.0 AE 0.5%), respectively. Tongan men also had higher BMI (Tongan ¼ 30.3 AE 0.3 kg=m 2 ; Australian ¼ 26.5 AE 0.3 kg=m 2 ), FFM (70.2 AE 0.5; 62.3 AE 0.6 kg) and fat mass (23.5 AE 0.6; 20.7 AE 0.7 kg). When compared with Australians within the same BMI range, Tongans had significantly higher FFM, elbow width, midarm muscle area and significantly lower %fat. The %fat at BMIs of 25 and 30 kg=m 2 in Australian women was equivalent to the %fat found in Tongan women at 28.8 and 35.1 kg=m 2 , respectively. BMIs of 25 and 30 kg=m 2 in Australian men corresponded with 27.5 and 35.8 kg=m 2 in Tongan men. Skinfold thicknesses, waist, hip and WHR measurements suggested differences in fat distribution and body shape between ethnic groups, particularly in women. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the standard healthy weight ranges recommended for international use may not be appropriate standards for use in the Tongan population.