2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03208763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
78
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frame duration was 8.3 ms. This combination of parameters gives a stable impression of a walking figure (Beintema et al, 2006), and all subjects were able to recognize it easily. In Experiment 3, a point-light walker with 12 points on the major joints was used.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The frame duration was 8.3 ms. This combination of parameters gives a stable impression of a walking figure (Beintema et al, 2006), and all subjects were able to recognize it easily. In Experiment 3, a point-light walker with 12 points on the major joints was used.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the strength of the aftereffect was greater in the facingadaptation task than in the walking-adaptation task. the stimuli consisted of point-light walkers with limited point lifetime, which limits veridical local image motion signals (Beintema et al, 2006;Beintema & Lappe, 2002). Spurious and nonveridical local motion signals introduced by this technique (Beintema et al, 2006;Casile & Giese, 2005) vary randomly from frame to frame and should not lead to any local motion adaptation.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Facing and Walking Aftereffectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the four biological-motion stimuli in the present study, velocity encoding is to some extent identical, whereas identity encoding differentiated by the global configuration is different. A number of previous studies have revealed that except for the upright intact biological motion, the other three biological-motion patterns contained no global configuration information but kept motion signals (Beintema, Georg, & Lappe, 2006;Bertenthal & Pinto, 1994;Hirai, Chang, Saunders, & Troje, 2011;Lange & Lappe, 2006;Wang, Zhang, He, & Jiang, 2010). Therefore, the possible explanation for the disappearance of the inversion effect during memory-guided tracking scrambled biological motion is that the spatial location information is not sufficient to build and maintain the representation continuity about a scrambled point-light walker or its inverted version, and object identity may act as an important information source in visual tracking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%