Perception and Misperception of Health Enhancing Physical Activity among Urban Community Dwellers in Ibadan, Nigeria: Profiling the Underestimators, the Overestimators, and the Realists

Abstract

Background: The ability to initiate and sustain health enhancing behaviour including physical activity requires appropriate self-perception of such activities. This study was conducted to investigate whether a group of Nigerian urban community dwellers are able to demonstrate a good perception of their physical activity behaviour. Methodology:The study was a cross-sectional survey of 1,153 urban community dwellers from three local government areas of Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria. Physical activity perception was assessed first; by self-rating of their physical activity based on a moderate-level physical activity vignette, followed by comparison with a more objective measure using the Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (SQUASH). Participants were thereafter classified as underestimators, overestimators, realistic actives or realistic inactives. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with the influence of sociodemographic characteristics on physical activity perception of participants tested with multiple logistic regression analyses at p<0.05. Results:A total of 604 (52.4%) of the community dwellers were physically inactive, but only 269 (23.3%) correctly rated themselves as inactive, 335 (29.1%) participants overestimated their physical activity level and 2.7% underestimated theirs. The odds of overestimation of physical activity was higher in middle-aged participants (OR=2.16; 95% CI=1.75-3.11) but lower among female participants (OR=0.58; 95% CI=0.30-0.79). Being a realistic inactive was associated with increasing age, female gender and higher income.Conclusions: About half of the community dwellers were physically inactive with about half of them having a misperception of their activity levels. Misperceptions and realities about physical activity were generally linked to sociodemographic characteristics. A specially designed educational intervention programme may provide more insight to the community dwellers about their physical activities.

Physical Activity during Pregnancy: Recommendations and Assessment Tools

“…Advantages - it takes into account small activities that are important for EE but that are usually neglected; 30 it was translated and validated for various countries; 30 33 34 this questionnaire has been found to be reliable for the measurement of physical activity in pregnant women with different intensities of obesity and can be used as a tool to detail physical activity. 35 …”

HIV, immune activation and salt-sensitive hypertension (HISH): a research proposal

“…This study has the potential to create points of intervention that will improve the management of hypertension and prevent dietary salt-related hypertension in future studies. Moreover, there is evidence that in the general population of Zambia, salt consumption exceeds that recommended by WHO [22]. This study is therefore, of clinical interest.…”

A socio-ecological model of factors influencing physical activity in pregnant women: a systematic review

“…A Shanghai study (2022) found that only 2.8% of pregnant women achieved the level of prenatal PA recommended by the international guidelines ( 70). An adequate level of PA in Iran (2010) was found to be 39% (71), in Norway (2020) it was 14.6% (72), in India (2015) 18% (73), and in Nigeria (2014) 10.2% (74). These numbers prove the need to take systemic measures to promote PA during pregnancy in various countries, including underdeveloped countries.…”