2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception–action coupling and expertise in interceptive actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that they were complementary but not similar, providing a full analysis of the postural control. Thus, our results are congruent with the idea that experts in sports requiring fine perceptive-motor control develop a shorter sensory-motor delay (Le Runigo et al, 2005). Gymnasts develop specific postural flexibility and adapt differently to constraints.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results suggest that they were complementary but not similar, providing a full analysis of the postural control. Thus, our results are congruent with the idea that experts in sports requiring fine perceptive-motor control develop a shorter sensory-motor delay (Le Runigo et al, 2005). Gymnasts develop specific postural flexibility and adapt differently to constraints.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results could be interpreted as an optimization in perception-action coupling with expertise. Recently, Le Runigo, Benguigui, and Bardy (2005) made a similar interpretation in a study on the effects of tennis practice on interceptive actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The former has emphasized that online adjustment during interception is achieved by a continuous coupling between the perceptual and motor systems by directly perceiving optical variables such as tau (Bootsma, Houbiers, Whiting, & van Wieringen, 1991;Bootsma & van Wieringen, 1990;Le Runigo et al, 2005;Tresilian, 1995) and controlling the required velocity of effector movement (Montagne, Laurent, Durey, & Bootsma, 1999;Peper, Bootsma, Mestre, & Bakker, 1994). That is, this theory does not emphasize the use of internal representation of future target motion, but rather, it emphasizes the use of current visual information of target motion to estimate the TTC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the total time of the target presentation was devised in such a way as to create a time scale similar to that which a baseball batter generally faces in actual batting (i.e., slow condition). In this case, however, the actual velocity in the batting task was not replicated in the experiment task because the actual target (i.e., baseball) traveling distance is about 16 m, whereas the distance in the present task was 4 m. Therefore, in order to create a relatively faster condition within the visual reaction time, the degree of velocity difference between the slow (10 m/s) and fast (15 m/s) conditions was set at 50 %, well above the threshold value that is generally found to be sufficient to allow the perception of a velocity difference (Benguigui, Ripoll, & Broderick, 2003;Le Runigo, Benguigui, & Bardy, 2005).…”
Section: Experimental Task and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has demonstrated that experts in fast ball sports are more successful at achieving interceptions when faced with environmental changes than novices (Ripoll and Latiri, 1997;Runigo et al, 2005Runigo et al, , 2010. Thus, improving the movement correction capability, which minimizes errors induced by unexpected environmental changes, is necessary to develop expertise in interception in a fast ball sport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%