2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percent improvement in renal pelvis antero-posterior diameter (PI-APD): Prospective validation and further exploration of cut-off values that predict success after pediatric pyeloplasty supporting safe monitoring with ultrasound alone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12 It has been suggested that ultrasound could be the sole initial method to be used at follow-up and that renal scan may be reserved for selected cases. 4,6,13 Several sonographic parameters for the evaluation of obstruction after pyeloplasty have been reviewed. 6 The grade of hydronephrosis at follow-up is a morphological parameter that may not identify relevant obstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…11,12 It has been suggested that ultrasound could be the sole initial method to be used at follow-up and that renal scan may be reserved for selected cases. 4,6,13 Several sonographic parameters for the evaluation of obstruction after pyeloplasty have been reviewed. 6 The grade of hydronephrosis at follow-up is a morphological parameter that may not identify relevant obstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The grade of hydronephrosis at follow-up is a morphological parameter that may not identify relevant obstruction. 4 Consequentially, several authors focused on an objective and quantifiable sonographic measure for relevant obstruction. 4,5,14 In several studies, the difference of APD postversus preoperative has been suggested to be of most value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations