Perceiving University Education as More Important for Men Than for Women: Gender Differences and Predictors of This Perception in Muslim Societies

Abstract

Education for women in Muslim societies had been discussed widely. However, it remains unclear if the perception of the importance of university education in Muslim societies and its predictors are different between men and women. Therefore, this research examined the following misogynistic perception among both genders: university education is more important for men than for women. This research aimed to determine gender differences and predictors of this perception. Sample populations were from Malaysia (N=820), Singapore (N=320), India (N=447), and Pakistan (N=1195). Mean difference test and binomial logistic regression analysis were conducted. The results revealed that more than half of the men agreed that they perceived university education as more important for men than for women. Over half of the women had the same perception. Some demographic variables were significant predictors of perceiving university education to be more important for men than for women, albeit inconsistent based on groups and countries. Some of the findings included being religious predicted less likelihood of misogynistic perception in countries such as Malaysia and Pakistan, but not in the others. Consistently, for both genders, perceptions concerning men’s superiority and women’s role being at home predicted the perception that university education was more important for men than for women. This suggests the intricate influence of the perception of ability and gender stereotype among Muslims when it concerns university education. Further studies are necessary to understand the rationale behind these predictors.

Predictors of Deviant Behavior Justification among Muslims: Sociodemographic Factors, Subjective Well-Being, and Perceived Religiousness

“…There have been studies on various deviant behaviors, including juvenile delinquency (Hong Chui et al, 2020), discrimination of certain groups (Aminnuddin, 2019a(Aminnuddin, , 2020a(Aminnuddin, , 2020b, substance use (Baker et al, 2020), and self-injurious behavior (Bakken, 2021).…”

Ethnic differences and predictors of racial and religious discriminations among Malaysian Malays and Chinese

“…Related studies to this are more on multicultural society and politics, through qualitative approach and narrative nature (Harris & Han, 2020;Neo, 2012;Noor, 2009;Noor & Leong, 2013). Researchers have also investigated hiring decisions (Lee & Abdul Khalid, 2016), discrimination concerning gender and higher education (Aminnuddin, 2020b), and attitudes toward diversity (Brown et al, 2018) using Malaysians as the sample population. There are also studies on discrimination-prone groups such as people with HIV (Tee et al, 2019) and immigrant workers (Noor & Shaker, 2017).…”