Perceiving Time Differences When You Should Not: Applying the El Greco Fallacy to Hypnotic Time Distortions

Abstract

The way we experience and estimate time – subjective time – does not systematically correspond to objective time (the physical duration of an event). Many factors can influence subjective time and lead to mental dilation or compression of objective time. The emotional valence of stimuli or the levels of attention or expectancy are known to modulate subjective time even though objective time is constant. Hypnosis too is known to alter people’s perception of time. However, it is not known whether hypnotic time distortions are intrinsic perceptual effects, based for example on the changing rate of an internal clock, or rather the result of a response to demand characteristics. Here we distinguished the theories using the logic of the El Greco fallacy. When participants initially had to compare the duration of two successive events —with the same duration — while in “trance,” they responded that the second event was on average longer than the first event. As both events were estimated in “trance,” if hypnosis had impacted on an internal clock, they should have been affected to the same extent. Conversely, when only the first event was in “trance,” there was no difference in perceived duration. The findings conform to an El Greco fallacy effect and challenge theories of hypnotic time distortion arguing that “trance” itself changes subjective time.

Stereotype threat may not impact women's inhibitory control or mathematical performance: Providing support for the null hypothesis

“…In line with recommendations by Dienes and McLatchie (2018), we then calculated Bayes factors (B) for all 1 degree of freedom effects (see Martin, Sackur, Anll o, Naish, & Dienes, 2016 for similar analyses). The results were analysed using both Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) and Bayesian analyses.…”

“…We report the pvalues and associated 95% confidence intervals for mean differences, as well as effect size measures (partial-eta squared and Cohen's d). In line with recommendations by Dienes and McLatchie (2018), we then calculated Bayes factors (B) for all 1 degree of freedom effects (see Martin, Sackur, Anll o, Naish, & Dienes, 2016 for similar analyses). Unlike NHST, Bayes factors do not depend on statistical power and do not attempt to control long-run error rate; rather, they quantify the degree of evidence and use the data themselves to determine the relative probability of different theories (Dienes, 2014;Jeffreys, 1939Jeffreys, /1961.…”

Finding the “odd one out”: Memory color effects and the logic of appearance

“…Our study in this vein is a variant on the "El Greco fallacy" -an episode from art history that has also become a technique for separating perception from judgment (Firestone, 2013b;Firestone & Scholl, 2014;Martin et al, 2016). The Spanish renaissance artist famously painted figures that were unusually elongated, and it was once theorized that this reflected a distortion in El Greco's vision due to unusually severe astigmatism, which was said to vertically blur his perception of the world.…”

The neural development of pragmatic inference‐making in natural discourse

“…and H0 and has been used as a stopping rule for data collection in previous studies (e.g., Martin, Sackur, Anlló, Naish, & Dienes, 2016 …”