2017
DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2017.1287073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceiving arousal and valence in facial expressions: Differences between children and adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in line with the results of Sylvester et al (2016) as well as with those of Russell and Paris (1994), who found significant correlations between adults and children (age 7 to 12, respectively, 4 and 5 years). High correlations between children's and adults’ ratings of valence and arousal have also been shown in rating studies using the same SAM scales with emotional stimuli from other modalities (e.g., McManis, Bradley, Berg, Cuthbert, & Lang, 2001, for pictures; Vesker, Bahn, Degé, Kauschke, & Schwarzer, 2017, for faces). In addition, our findings confirm the results of Sylvester et al (2016), Schmidtke et al (2014), and Russell and Paris (1994) with respect to the differential strength of the correlation of arousal and valence ratings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Our findings are in line with the results of Sylvester et al (2016) as well as with those of Russell and Paris (1994), who found significant correlations between adults and children (age 7 to 12, respectively, 4 and 5 years). High correlations between children's and adults’ ratings of valence and arousal have also been shown in rating studies using the same SAM scales with emotional stimuli from other modalities (e.g., McManis, Bradley, Berg, Cuthbert, & Lang, 2001, for pictures; Vesker, Bahn, Degé, Kauschke, & Schwarzer, 2017, for faces). In addition, our findings confirm the results of Sylvester et al (2016), Schmidtke et al (2014), and Russell and Paris (1994) with respect to the differential strength of the correlation of arousal and valence ratings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This selection of facial expressions for the positive and negative emotion categories was a result of striving to make sure that each category is composed of a variety of expressions, in order to truly represent a category of positive and negative emotional expressions, rather than merely contrasting happy faces against the negative expressions. We also balanced the two categories in terms of mean arousal and valence using ratings by adult subjects in a previous study [ 36 ] using a 7-point SAM valence scale [ 37 ], and a 5-point SAM arousal scale [ 37 ]. This meant that the arousal across the categories was approximately equal, and that the positive category mean should be as positive as the negative category is negative, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photographs were chosen in such a way that the positive and negative categories featured a variety of expressions, but still had very similar average ratings of arousal and valence as measured form a neutral point (i.e., the negative faces were as negative as the positive faces were positive) based on ratings made by adult participants in a separate study ( Vesker et al, 2017 ) using a 5-point SAM scale ( Bradley and Lang, 1994 ) for arousal, and a 7-point SAM scale for valence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%