2021
DOI: 10.2196/27918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived Utility and Characterization of Personal Google Search Histories to Detect Data Patterns Proximal to a Suicide Attempt in Individuals Who Previously Attempted Suicide: Pilot Cohort Study

Abstract: Background Despite decades of research to better understand suicide risk and to develop detection and prevention methods, suicide is still one of the leading causes of death globally. While large-scale studies using real-world evidence from electronic health records can identify who is at risk, they have not been successful at pinpointing when someone is at risk. Personalized social media and online search history data, by contrast, could provide an ongoing real-world datastream revealing internal … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theme is likely unique to the digital environment of Sanctioned Suicide as it is only possible to detect within a setting boasting a combination of minimal censorship and maximal anonymity. While there are no known studies which have addressed this association explicitly, the finding is supported by research on search behaviors of at-risk individuals (Areán et al, 2021;Harris et al, 2009;Kemp & Collings, 2011). There is evidence that STB-related online activity is elevated in those who report greater STB risk-related symptoms, have perceptions of decreased social support, and are less likely to engage in helpseeking behaviors, leading to a greater propensity for individuals to visit "pro-suicide" sites and search for suicide methods relative to others at-risk who do not utilize the internet for STBrelated purposes (Harris et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This theme is likely unique to the digital environment of Sanctioned Suicide as it is only possible to detect within a setting boasting a combination of minimal censorship and maximal anonymity. While there are no known studies which have addressed this association explicitly, the finding is supported by research on search behaviors of at-risk individuals (Areán et al, 2021;Harris et al, 2009;Kemp & Collings, 2011). There is evidence that STB-related online activity is elevated in those who report greater STB risk-related symptoms, have perceptions of decreased social support, and are less likely to engage in helpseeking behaviors, leading to a greater propensity for individuals to visit "pro-suicide" sites and search for suicide methods relative to others at-risk who do not utilize the internet for STBrelated purposes (Harris et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…An important factor to consider when proposing such automated analyses is the degree to which passive monitoring of therapist-client communication for the purpose of measuring BA may be construed as invasive or intrusive. While we did not directly engage with patients in the current work, we note that our recent work in the suicide prevention domain provides some indication that passive monitoring of this sort may be acceptable to patients when conducted by a trusted party, with 68% of survey participants indicating that the automated analysis of personalized web search data for suicide prevention would be acceptable provided this triggered minimally invasive interventions (such as connection to a support network or therapist) only [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, understanding and preventing the root causes for bias in AI systems must be a priority to monitor and mitigate such consequences. Privacy concerns among users of various technology-based assessments and interventions has also been a central theme arising in research from our group (54)(55)(56). Trust may vary as a function of who is conducting the research-for example, trust in internetbased research is higher (and participants more likely to share their data) when the research is conducted by university researchers compared to private companies (55).…”
Section: Methodological Practical and Other Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%