Perceived side effects of biomaterials in prosthetic dentistry

Hensten‐Pettersen, Arne; Jacobsen, Nils

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(91)90066-6

Cited by 87 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, solubility represents a loss of components during immersion and the eluted substances can sometimes irritate the oral mucosa 8,9) . Water sorption depends on the degree of hydrophobicity and porosity of the material 33) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, there is a problem of bacterial contamination, which may be due to the roughness of the surface or water sorption of the materials 7) . Furthermore, the elution of residual monomers may produce soft tissue reactions such as redness and swelling of the oral mucosa and pain 8,9) . The degree of tissue irritation depends on the amount of eluted residual monomer 10) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Basic evaluation on physical properties of experimental fluorinated soft lining materials

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present study was to compare the properties required for the clinical application of soft lining materials containing a fluorinated monomer versus that of conventional materials in an effort to develop a new soft lining material with long-term stable viscoelastic properties. Four soft lining materials were examined. Two experimental materials containing dodecafluoroheptyl methacrylate (SR12F) or tridecafluorooctyl methacrylate (SR13F) were prepared. Two commercial soft lining materials, one acrylicbased and one silicone rubber-based, were selected as reference materials. Shore A hardness, viscoelastic properties, water sorption, solubility, and staining resistance were evaluated. The Shore A hardness and the displacements were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD test. The water sorption, the solubility and the color change were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. The significance level was set at 0.05. SR12F and SR13F showed greater viscous flow, low water sorption, low solubility, and good staining resistance compared to the commercial products. The results indicate that the soft lining materials containing fluorinated monomers might have a potentially long-term stable viscoelastic behavior.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Basic evaluation on physical properties of experimental fluorinated soft lining materials

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These reactions range from localised irritation of the skin to allergic contact dermatitis. [15][16][17][18] The type and extent of oral soft tissue reactions to eugenol vary, but can be thought of in three ways:…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adverse reactions associated with the use of eugenol in dentistry

et al. 2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In particular, ingredients of NiCr and CoCr alloys such as nickel, cobalt, chromium, and molybdenum, exhibit strong effects on the body cells and tissues and elicit toxic and morphological effects as well as cellular metabolic disorders [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. On the other hand, allergic reactions to metals such as Ni, Cr, Co, Pd, Au, Cu and Ag found in restorative materials vary depending on gender [3] and profession [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cytological response of palatal epithelium to TiN-coated CoCr alloy denture

Łukomska−Szymańska

Brzeziński

Zieliński

et al. 2012

Folia Histochem Cytobiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The aim of this study was to assess the impact of titanium nitride coatings on CoCr alloy metal parts in framework dentures on human palatal epithelium cytology compared to framework dentures made with the same alloy but without titanium nitride coating, and to acrylic dentures. Every prosthetic restoration introduced into the oral cavity and remaining in direct contact with the palate exhibits a varied and harmful effect on the state of the palatal epithelium by disturbing its keratinization. CoCr alloy dentures produce a significantly greater perturbation of keratinization compared to acrylic dentures. There is no evidence showing that a titanium nitride coating of the CoCr alloy plays a protective role in the environment of the oral cavity.

show abstract

Perceived side effects of biomaterials in prosthetic dentistry

Cited by 87 publications

References 11 publications

Basic evaluation on physical properties of experimental fluorinated soft lining materials

Basic evaluation on physical properties of experimental fluorinated soft lining materials

Adverse reactions associated with the use of eugenol in dentistry

Cytological response of palatal epithelium to TiN-coated CoCr alloy denture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About